When and How Cognitive Biases Enhance Project Investment Decisions

Project investment decisions (i.e., selecting which project proposals to fund) are critical for project and organizational success, because poor decisions can lead to wasted resources, missed opportunities, diminished competitiveness, and ultimately project failure. Literature identifies cognitive bias (e.g., optimism, escalation, anchoring, and overconfidence bias) as a key factor that hinders project investment decision-making. However, we argue that cognitive bias can also have positive effects on the quality of these decisions. We interviewed 15 project practitioners and surveyed 101 managers to uncover when cognitive biases enhance project investment decisions and how. We found recency bias is a key cognitive bias that enhances project investment decision quality, because in contemporary dynamic project environments reliance on the latest, contextually relevant information becomes particularly valuable. We contribute to the project management literature by explaining how cognitive biases can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on project decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Project Management Journal
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728261490106
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

When and How Cognitive Biases Enhance Project Investment Decisions

Alicia Gilchrist, Ofer Zwikael, Aulia Haley, Amelia O’Meagher
Project Management Journal
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

When and How Cognitive Biases Enhance Project Investment Decisions

Alicia Gilchrist, Ofer Zwikael, Aulia Haley, Amelia O’Meagher
article en

Abstract

Project investment decisions (i.e., selecting which project proposals to fund) are critical for project and organizational success, because poor decisions can lead to wasted resources, missed opportunities, diminished competitiveness, and ultimately project failure. Literature identifies cognitive bias (e.g., optimism, escalation, anchoring, and overconfidence bias) as a key factor that hinders project investment decision-making. However, we argue that cognitive bias can also have positive effects on the quality of these decisions. We interviewed 15 project practitioners and surveyed 101 managers to uncover when cognitive biases enhance project investment decisions and how. We found recency bias is a key cognitive bias that enhances project investment decision quality, because in contemporary dynamic project environments reliance on the latest, contextually relevant information becomes particularly valuable. We contribute to the project management literature by explaining how cognitive biases can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on project decision-making.

Project Management Journal
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When and How Cognitive Biases Enhance Project Investment Decisions — Alicia Gilchrist, Ofer Zwikael, et al. · Project Management Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS