Epidemiology and treatment outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcoma in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients in Japan: data from population-based National Cancer Registry 2016–2019

This Japanese population-based retrospective study using National Cancer Registry data (2016-2019) revealed age-specific disparities in treatment and outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in patients under 40 years. A total of 1,209 bone sarcoma (BS) and 3,096 soft tissue sarcoma (STS) cases were analyzed for demographics, treatment modalities, survival rates, and prognostic factors. Osteosarcoma (53%) and Ewing sarcoma (15%) were the most common BS subtypes. Pediatric patients presented more frequently with metastases and received more chemotherapy, while surgery was performed in 80% of BS cases. For STS, fibrosarcoma (19%) and rhabdomyosarcoma (13%) predominated. AYA (adolescent and young adult) patients underwent more surgeries, whereas pediatric patients received more chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Three-year overall survival rates were 67% for BS and 79% for STS. Prognosis was significantly influenced by disease extent and surgical intervention. Age was an adverse prognostic factor for STS but not for BS. This first comprehensive Japanese population-based study demonstrates treatment disparities across age groups in sarcoma care. We revealed that pediatric and AYA sarcoma care in Japan shows clear age-related disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Investigation
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2026.2723355
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Epidemiology and treatment outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcoma in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients in Japan: data from population-based National Cancer Registry 2016–2019

Chigusa Morizane, Eisuke Kobayashi, Tomoyuki Satake, Hiroya Kondo et al.
Cancer Investigation
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Epidemiology and treatment outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcoma in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients in Japan: data from population-based National Cancer Registry 2016–2019

Chigusa Morizane, Eisuke Kobayashi, Tomoyuki Satake, Hiroya Kondo, Shintaro Iwata, Takahiro Higashi, Shudai Muramatsu, Yu Toda, Toshiyuki Takemori, Koichi Ogura, Akira Kawai
article en

Abstract

This Japanese population-based retrospective study using National Cancer Registry data (2016-2019) revealed age-specific disparities in treatment and outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in patients under 40 years. A total of 1,209 bone sarcoma (BS) and 3,096 soft tissue sarcoma (STS) cases were analyzed for demographics, treatment modalities, survival rates, and prognostic factors. Osteosarcoma (53%) and Ewing sarcoma (15%) were the most common BS subtypes. Pediatric patients presented more frequently with metastases and received more chemotherapy, while surgery was performed in 80% of BS cases. For STS, fibrosarcoma (19%) and rhabdomyosarcoma (13%) predominated. AYA (adolescent and young adult) patients underwent more surgeries, whereas pediatric patients received more chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Three-year overall survival rates were 67% for BS and 79% for STS. Prognosis was significantly influenced by disease extent and surgical intervention. Age was an adverse prognostic factor for STS but not for BS. This first comprehensive Japanese population-based study demonstrates treatment disparities across age groups in sarcoma care. We revealed that pediatric and AYA sarcoma care in Japan shows clear age-related disparities.

Cancer Investigation
National Cancer Center (US), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.