Empathy, logophoricity and the nature of Chinese long-distance reflexive ziji

Abstract In this paper, we explore an explanatory theory for the Long-Distance Reflexive (LDR) ziji in Chinese from the semantic-pragmatic perspective. Although it is generally held that LDR ziji has the properties of de se interpretation, subject-orientation and the blocking effect, we discover some of its novel characteristics such as the possible non- de se readings in attitude reports, the backward binding phenomenon in extensional contexts, and in addition the blocking effect induced by the second person pronoun ni ‘you’ in sentences with the first person matrix subject wo ‘I’ which cannot be readily captured under the previous accounts. In the spirit of the empathy account originally due to Kuno and his colleagues ( Kuno 1987 ; Kuno & Kaburaki 1977 ), we propose a new empathy-based account of LDR ziji . Our main claim is this: LDR ziji is always an anaphor with the empathy requirement such that it requires the speaker to empathize with its referent in both intensional and extensional contexts; and in intensional contexts, it also tends to be a de se anaphor, or logophoric, though there are exceptions in some particular cases, e.g., indirect speech. In our account, we demonstrate that the distribution and properties of LDR ziji can receive a plausible explanation by resorting to a series of empathy constraints ( Kuno 1987 ; Oshima 2007b ) as well as its nature as the objective-self projection ( Hirose 2002 , 2014 ). Finally, comparing Chinese LDR ziji with Japanese LDR zibun , we point out the different pragmatic effects on them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.25008.wan
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Empathy, logophoricity and the nature of Chinese long-distance reflexive ziji

Haihua Pan, Yingying Wang
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Empathy, logophoricity and the nature of Chinese long-distance reflexive ziji

Haihua Pan, Yingying Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we explore an explanatory theory for the Long-Distance Reflexive (LDR) ziji in Chinese from the semantic-pragmatic perspective. Although it is generally held that LDR ziji has the properties of de se interpretation, subject-orientation and the blocking effect, we discover some of its novel characteristics such as the possible non- de se readings in attitude reports, the backward binding phenomenon in extensional contexts, and in addition the blocking effect induced by the second person pronoun ni ‘you’ in sentences with the first person matrix subject wo ‘I’ which cannot be readily captured under the previous accounts. In the spirit of the empathy account originally due to Kuno and his colleagues ( Kuno 1987 ; Kuno & Kaburaki 1977 ), we propose a new empathy-based account of LDR ziji . Our main claim is this: LDR ziji is always an anaphor with the empathy requirement such that it requires the speaker to empathize with its referent in both intensional and extensional contexts; and in intensional contexts, it also tends to be a de se anaphor, or logophoric, though there are exceptions in some particular cases, e.g., indirect speech. In our account, we demonstrate that the distribution and properties of LDR ziji can receive a plausible explanation by resorting to a series of empathy constraints ( Kuno 1987 ; Oshima 2007b ) as well as its nature as the objective-self projection ( Hirose 2002 , 2014 ). Finally, comparing Chinese LDR ziji with Japanese LDR zibun , we point out the different pragmatic effects on them.

International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Hunan University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.