Institutional Post-Acute Care Use After Hospitalization by Medicare Type, 2017-2022

OBJECTIVES: To compare national discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) and skilled nursing facilities (SNF) after short-stay hospitalization among Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using publicly available aggregate Medicare utilization data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included United States MA and TM beneficiaries from 2017 to 2022. METHODS: Primary outcomes were discharge rates to IRFs and SNFs per 1000 acute hospital discharges and in-facility mortality. Secondary outcomes included community discharge and 30-day readmission among TM beneficiaries. Year-adjusted Poisson regression with acute discharges as an offset estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing MA and TM utilization. Discharge-weighted logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) for mortality, community discharge, and readmission. Trends in IRF vs SNF utilization were evaluated using year-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with TM beneficiaries, MA beneficiaries had lower discharge rates to IRF (IRR, 0.397; 95% CI, 0.395-0.398), with a smaller difference for SNF (IRR, 0.904; 95% CI, 0.903-0.905). Within IRF, in-facility mortality odds were higher for MA beneficiaries (OR, 14.69; 95% CI, 14.21-15.18). Within SNF, in-facility mortality odds were lower for MA beneficiaries (OR, 0.447; 95% CI, 0.444-0.450). Across both payers combined, mortality was lower in IRF than SNF (0.71% vs 2.46%; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.278-0.286; P < .001). Among TM beneficiaries, discharge to IRF was associated with lower odds of 30-day readmission (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.76) and higher odds of community discharge (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.83-1.85). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: MA beneficiaries had lower downstream use of IRF after hospitalization than TM beneficiaries. In-facility mortality differed among post-acute settings and payer. Patient-level case-mix at the referral source is needed to evaluate whether these differences persist after case mix adjustment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2026.106491
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Institutional Post-Acute Care Use After Hospitalization by Medicare Type, 2017-2022

Emine Poyraz, Joshua Startup, Jiwon Park
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Institutional Post-Acute Care Use After Hospitalization by Medicare Type, 2017-2022

Emine Poyraz, Joshua Startup, Jiwon Park
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare national discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) and skilled nursing facilities (SNF) after short-stay hospitalization among Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using publicly available aggregate Medicare utilization data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included United States MA and TM beneficiaries from 2017 to 2022. METHODS: Primary outcomes were discharge rates to IRFs and SNFs per 1000 acute hospital discharges and in-facility mortality. Secondary outcomes included community discharge and 30-day readmission among TM beneficiaries. Year-adjusted Poisson regression with acute discharges as an offset estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing MA and TM utilization. Discharge-weighted logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) for mortality, community discharge, and readmission. Trends in IRF vs SNF utilization were evaluated using year-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with TM beneficiaries, MA beneficiaries had lower discharge rates to IRF (IRR, 0.397; 95% CI, 0.395-0.398), with a smaller difference for SNF (IRR, 0.904; 95% CI, 0.903-0.905). Within IRF, in-facility mortality odds were higher for MA beneficiaries (OR, 14.69; 95% CI, 14.21-15.18). Within SNF, in-facility mortality odds were lower for MA beneficiaries (OR, 0.447; 95% CI, 0.444-0.450). Across both payers combined, mortality was lower in IRF than SNF (0.71% vs 2.46%; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.278-0.286; P < .001). Among TM beneficiaries, discharge to IRF was associated with lower odds of 30-day readmission (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.76) and higher odds of community discharge (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.83-1.85). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: MA beneficiaries had lower downstream use of IRF after hospitalization than TM beneficiaries. In-facility mortality differed among post-acute settings and payer. Patient-level case-mix at the referral source is needed to evaluate whether these differences persist after case mix adjustment.

Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationVol. 27(11)
University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.