AI boosts publication output more at non-elite institutions: Evidence from AlphaFold

AlphaFold, an AI system for highly accurate protein structure prediction, has the potential to lower barriers in structural biology research. We hypothesize that its release has created greater opportunities for scientists at non-elite institutions. To test this, we employ a difference-in-differences strategy, comparing the publication output of 3434 structural biologists with that of 3014 other (non-structural) biologists. Scientists are categorized as being at elite or non-elite institutions based on whether their affiliations are among the top 50 institutions ranked by their h-index. Our findings suggest that AlphaFold-like models are associated with a larger increase in the publication output of structural biologists at non-elite institutions. However, this increase is largely concentrated in lower-tier journals. These results demonstrate how AI is reshaping competitive dynamics and altering the landscape of scientific progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Informetrics
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101859
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

AI boosts publication output more at non-elite institutions: Evidence from AlphaFold

Tianxing Pan, Jiang Li
Journal of Informetrics
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

AI boosts publication output more at non-elite institutions: Evidence from AlphaFold

Tianxing Pan, Jiang Li
article en

Abstract

AlphaFold, an AI system for highly accurate protein structure prediction, has the potential to lower barriers in structural biology research. We hypothesize that its release has created greater opportunities for scientists at non-elite institutions. To test this, we employ a difference-in-differences strategy, comparing the publication output of 3434 structural biologists with that of 3014 other (non-structural) biologists. Scientists are categorized as being at elite or non-elite institutions based on whether their affiliations are among the top 50 institutions ranked by their h-index. Our findings suggest that AlphaFold-like models are associated with a larger increase in the publication output of structural biologists at non-elite institutions. However, this increase is largely concentrated in lower-tier journals. These results demonstrate how AI is reshaping competitive dynamics and altering the landscape of scientific progress.

Journal of InformetricsVol. 20(4)
Nanjing University (CN)
Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.