Gender and Relationship Dynamics in Target-Reported Nightlife Sexual Harassment: An Exploratory Study of Perpetrator Characteristics

Little is known about the perpetration of sexual harassment in nightlife settings. This exploratory study examined target-reported experiences of sexual harassment, focusing on the perceived gender of the perpetrator and the target–perpetrator relationship across three harassment types. An online survey was used to examine self-reported experiences of sexual harassment among Australian adults (N = 958, 61.3% female). Nearly half (48.7%) of participants reported experiencing nightlife sexual harassment within the past 12 months. Verbal sexual harassment was the most common type of harassment reported by women (43.5%) and gender diverse (57.5%) participants. Across all harassment types, perpetrators were most often male (79.0%–87.9%) and strangers (62.8%–88.7%). However, male targets reported a more even gender distribution of perpetrators, particularly for verbal sexual harassment (50.0% male, 44.4% female) and pressured sexual contact (49.0% female, 45.1% male). Men were more likely than women to know the perpetrator in incidents of physical (χ2 = 7.54, p < .001) and verbal sexual harassment (χ2 = 22.71, p < .001). These findings suggest that patterns of perpetration vary by harassment type and target gender. Insights into how harassment patterns differ can inform targeted interventions, particularly in policy design, staff training, and bystander engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Victims & Offenders
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2026.2731203
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Gender and Relationship Dynamics in Target-Reported Nightlife Sexual Harassment: An Exploratory Study of Perpetrator Characteristics

Peter Miller, Eric Koukounas, Kerri Coomber, Nicholas Taylor et al.
Victims & Offenders
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Gender and Relationship Dynamics in Target-Reported Nightlife Sexual Harassment: An Exploratory Study of Perpetrator Characteristics

Peter Miller, Eric Koukounas, Kerri Coomber, Nicholas Taylor, Kira Button, Dominique de Andrade, Zara Quigg
article en

Abstract

Little is known about the perpetration of sexual harassment in nightlife settings. This exploratory study examined target-reported experiences of sexual harassment, focusing on the perceived gender of the perpetrator and the target–perpetrator relationship across three harassment types. An online survey was used to examine self-reported experiences of sexual harassment among Australian adults (N = 958, 61.3% female). Nearly half (48.7%) of participants reported experiencing nightlife sexual harassment within the past 12 months. Verbal sexual harassment was the most common type of harassment reported by women (43.5%) and gender diverse (57.5%) participants. Across all harassment types, perpetrators were most often male (79.0%–87.9%) and strangers (62.8%–88.7%). However, male targets reported a more even gender distribution of perpetrators, particularly for verbal sexual harassment (50.0% male, 44.4% female) and pressured sexual contact (49.0% female, 45.1% male). Men were more likely than women to know the perpetrator in incidents of physical (χ2 = 7.54, p < .001) and verbal sexual harassment (χ2 = 22.71, p < .001). These findings suggest that patterns of perpetration vary by harassment type and target gender. Insights into how harassment patterns differ can inform targeted interventions, particularly in policy design, staff training, and bystander engagement.

Victims & Offenders
Griffith University (AU), Burnet Institute (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Curtin University (AU), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.