Effectiveness, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of BGM0504 , a Dual GLP ‐1/ GIP Receptor Agonist, in Chinese Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: A Phase 2 Multicentre, Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial

AIMS: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of the dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonist BGM0504 in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 2 trial, 120 participants were assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of BGM0504 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints included absolute body weight change, waist circumference, and the proportions of participants achieving prespecified weight-loss targets. Safety was assessed using adverse events, laboratory tests, and vital signs. The trial was registered with the Chinese National Medical Products Administration (CTR20233198) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06973681). RESULTS: Mean percentage changes in body weight from baseline to week 24 were -10.68%, -16.07%, -18.33%, and 0.13% with BGM0504 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and placebo, respectively; all BGM0504 doses were significantly superior to placebo (all p < 0.0001). Mean reductions in waist circumference were -8.88 cm, -12.71 cm, -14.38 cm, and -1.03 cm, respectively (all p < 0.001 vs. placebo). The proportions of participants achieving clinically meaningful weight loss increased in a dose-dependent manner across BGM0504 groups versus placebo (all p < 0.001). PK analyses showed an approximately linear dose-exposure relationship across the evaluated dose range. TEAEs occurred in 96.7%, 93.5%, 100.0%, and 86.7% of participants in the BGM0504 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, and drug-related adverse events occurred in 53.3%, 80.6%, 93.1%, and 40.0%. The most common selected TEAEs were gastrointestinal, including nausea, diarrhoea, and vomiting. One serious adverse event occurred in the 10 mg group and no TEAEs led to trial withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly BGM0504 was associated with substantial dose-dependent weight loss and acceptable tolerability in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, supporting further clinical development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71193
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effectiveness, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of BGM0504 , a Dual GLP ‐1/ GIP Receptor Agonist, in Chinese Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: A Phase 2 Multicentre, Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial

Daosheng Xie, 邹婵 ZOU Chan, Linong Ji, Guoping Yang et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Effectiveness, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of BGM0504 , a Dual GLP ‐1/ GIP Receptor Agonist, in Chinese Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: A Phase 2 Multicentre, Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial

Daosheng Xie, 邹婵 ZOU Chan, Linong Ji, Guoping Yang, YANGQING HUANG, Haifeng Ding, Haibin Zhang, Xiaohui Jiang, Zhao Cao, Xuemei Yuan, Jiandong Yuan
article en

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of the dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonist BGM0504 in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 2 trial, 120 participants were assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of BGM0504 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints included absolute body weight change, waist circumference, and the proportions of participants achieving prespecified weight-loss targets. Safety was assessed using adverse events, laboratory tests, and vital signs. The trial was registered with the Chinese National Medical Products Administration (CTR20233198) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06973681). RESULTS: Mean percentage changes in body weight from baseline to week 24 were -10.68%, -16.07%, -18.33%, and 0.13% with BGM0504 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and placebo, respectively; all BGM0504 doses were significantly superior to placebo (all p < 0.0001). Mean reductions in waist circumference were -8.88 cm, -12.71 cm, -14.38 cm, and -1.03 cm, respectively (all p < 0.001 vs. placebo). The proportions of participants achieving clinically meaningful weight loss increased in a dose-dependent manner across BGM0504 groups versus placebo (all p < 0.001). PK analyses showed an approximately linear dose-exposure relationship across the evaluated dose range. TEAEs occurred in 96.7%, 93.5%, 100.0%, and 86.7% of participants in the BGM0504 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, and drug-related adverse events occurred in 53.3%, 80.6%, 93.1%, and 40.0%. The most common selected TEAEs were gastrointestinal, including nausea, diarrhoea, and vomiting. One serious adverse event occurred in the 10 mg group and no TEAEs led to trial withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly BGM0504 was associated with substantial dose-dependent weight loss and acceptable tolerability in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, supporting further clinical development.

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Central South University (CN), Peking University (CN), Peking University People's Hospital (CN), Bio-Medical Science (South Korea) (KR), Biopharma Technology (United Kingdom) (GB), Third Xiangya Hospital (CN), Fleetwood Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.