Control without credibility: immigration to the UK since the Brexit referendum

Immigration was central both to the 2016 Brexit referendum campaign and to the political narratives that followed it. Yet the trajectory of migration to the UK since the referendum bears little resemblance to the expectations – or promises – articulated at the time. This paper explores the analytical distinction between formal control over the rules governing migration and the much more limited ability of governments to determine the resulting volume of migration. It provides an overview and interpretation of developments since 2016, focusing on three interrelated themes. First, it describes trends in migration flows and stocks, highlighting the sharp fall in EU migration, the compensating increase in non-EU migration, and the role of both policy and economic developments in driving these trends. Second, it examines the economic and labour market impacts of these changes over 2016–2025. Third, it analyses the post-Brexit policy framework and the Labour government's approach since 2024. The paper concludes by reflecting on the implications for future UK migration policy and for the wider political economy of Brexit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Social Science
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2026.2726952
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Control without credibility: immigration to the UK since the Brexit referendum

Jonathan Portes
Contemporary Social Science
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Control without credibility: immigration to the UK since the Brexit referendum

Jonathan Portes
article en

Abstract

Immigration was central both to the 2016 Brexit referendum campaign and to the political narratives that followed it. Yet the trajectory of migration to the UK since the referendum bears little resemblance to the expectations – or promises – articulated at the time. This paper explores the analytical distinction between formal control over the rules governing migration and the much more limited ability of governments to determine the resulting volume of migration. It provides an overview and interpretation of developments since 2016, focusing on three interrelated themes. First, it describes trends in migration flows and stocks, highlighting the sharp fall in EU migration, the compensating increase in non-EU migration, and the role of both policy and economic developments in driving these trends. Second, it examines the economic and labour market impacts of these changes over 2016–2025. Third, it analyses the post-Brexit policy framework and the Labour government's approach since 2024. The paper concludes by reflecting on the implications for future UK migration policy and for the wider political economy of Brexit.

Contemporary Social ScienceVol. 21(1)
King's College London (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Control without credibility: immigration to the UK since the Brexit referendum — Jonathan Portes · Contemporary Social Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS