Resource, actor, beneficiary, or agent? A service-dominant perspective on generative artificial intelligence

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) challenges core concepts in service science by blurring boundaries among resources, actors, and beneficiaries. Using service-dominant logic (SDL) as a theoretical lens, we review the distinctive properties of these concepts, introduce the agent concept into SDL, and analyze GenAI’s precise role in service exchange processes. We employ a two-phase research approach: First, we conduct a systematic literature review to derive defining properties of resources, actors, beneficiaries, and agents. We then assess eight contemporary GenAI systems against these properties. Our evidence indicates that GenAI is best understood as an operant resource and, depending on design and context, as an actor and agent. Conversely, GenAI does not qualify as a beneficiary, as it is neither individually capable of phenomenologically experiencing and determining value nor a social system of individuals with such capacities. Our findings propose an update to SDL’s core concepts and understanding, as well as a nuanced conceptual clarification of GenAI’s role, offering guidance for researchers and practitioners seeking to understand and design service interactions that incorporate GenAI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Markets
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-026-00932-w
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Resource, actor, beneficiary, or agent? A service-dominant perspective on generative artificial intelligence

Daniel Beverungen, Philipp Hansmeier, Jannika Marie Schäfer, Philipp Zur Heiden
Electronic Markets
Service and Product Innovation
article

Resource, actor, beneficiary, or agent? A service-dominant perspective on generative artificial intelligence

Daniel Beverungen, Philipp Hansmeier, Jannika Marie Schäfer, Philipp Zur Heiden
article en

Abstract

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) challenges core concepts in service science by blurring boundaries among resources, actors, and beneficiaries. Using service-dominant logic (SDL) as a theoretical lens, we review the distinctive properties of these concepts, introduce the agent concept into SDL, and analyze GenAI’s precise role in service exchange processes. We employ a two-phase research approach: First, we conduct a systematic literature review to derive defining properties of resources, actors, beneficiaries, and agents. We then assess eight contemporary GenAI systems against these properties. Our evidence indicates that GenAI is best understood as an operant resource and, depending on design and context, as an actor and agent. Conversely, GenAI does not qualify as a beneficiary, as it is neither individually capable of phenomenologically experiencing and determining value nor a social system of individuals with such capacities. Our findings propose an update to SDL’s core concepts and understanding, as well as a nuanced conceptual clarification of GenAI’s role, offering guidance for researchers and practitioners seeking to understand and design service interactions that incorporate GenAI.

Electronic MarketsVol. 36(1)
Paderborn University (DE)
Staatsministerin für Kultur und Medien
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Service and Product Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resource, actor, beneficiary, or agent? A service-dominant perspective on generative artificial intelligence — Daniel Beverungen, Philipp Hansmeier, et al. · Electronic Markets (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS