What influences patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis performed by nursing staff? A qualitative interview study

Background: Haemodialysis is a life-sustaining procedure for people with kidney failure, requiring cannulation with two needles before each treatment. Individuals undergo haemodialysis at least three times a week, leading to at least 312 cannulations each year. Some people find cannulation distressing and associated with noxious symptoms. Aim: This study aimed to explore what influences patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis as undertaken by nursing staff, generating understanding about improvements in procedure. Methods: Thirty participants ( n = 30) from two renal centres in the United Kingdom completed semi-structured interviews. Intensive interviewing, constant comparison analysis and theoretical sampling from grounded theory were employed to meet the study aims. Results: Three categories describe the components that influence patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis: ‘Trying to make cannulation more comfortable’; ‘Preserving humanity and individuality’; and ‘The necessity of cannulation for haemodialysis forces coping’. Conclusion: Coping with cannulation for haemodialysis is dynamic with various facilitative components. Patients require strategies to make cannulation more comfortable, trust and empathy, and understanding and support to navigate and accept the challenges of cannulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of research in nursing
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261466773
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

What influences patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis performed by nursing staff? A qualitative interview study

Maarten W. Taal, Heather Buchanan, Louise Bramley, Catherine Fielding et al.
Journal of research in nursing
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

What influences patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis performed by nursing staff? A qualitative interview study

Maarten W. Taal, Heather Buchanan, Louise Bramley, Catherine Fielding, Caitlin Sorrell, Sarah Brand, Nicholas M Selby
article en

Abstract

Background: Haemodialysis is a life-sustaining procedure for people with kidney failure, requiring cannulation with two needles before each treatment. Individuals undergo haemodialysis at least three times a week, leading to at least 312 cannulations each year. Some people find cannulation distressing and associated with noxious symptoms. Aim: This study aimed to explore what influences patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis as undertaken by nursing staff, generating understanding about improvements in procedure. Methods: Thirty participants ( n = 30) from two renal centres in the United Kingdom completed semi-structured interviews. Intensive interviewing, constant comparison analysis and theoretical sampling from grounded theory were employed to meet the study aims. Results: Three categories describe the components that influence patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis: ‘Trying to make cannulation more comfortable’; ‘Preserving humanity and individuality’; and ‘The necessity of cannulation for haemodialysis forces coping’. Conclusion: Coping with cannulation for haemodialysis is dynamic with various facilitative components. Patients require strategies to make cannulation more comfortable, trust and empathy, and understanding and support to navigate and accept the challenges of cannulation.

Journal of research in nursing
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.