Chemotherapy Backbone and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combinations Across Solid Tumors: A Pan-Tumor Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy represent a first-line standard across multiple solid tumors; however, the contribution of chemotherapy backbone to the efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase II-III randomized trials comparing ICI-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, with the aim of evaluating whether chemotherapy backbone selection was associated with differences in clinical outcomes across tumor types. RESULTS: Thirty-nine trials including over 30,000 patients were analyzed. Detailed characteristics of included trials by tumor type are reported in Supplementary Tables S1-S6. Chemo-immunotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66-0.72) and overall survival (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.76-0.81). Among the evaluated chemotherapy backbones, platinum-pemetrexed was associated with the greatest relative survival benefit (HR 0.66), followed by platinum-taxane and fluoropyrimidine-platinum regimens (HR 0.78), whereas platinum-gemcitabine showed comparatively lower benefit (HR 0.83). Anti-PD-1 regimens demonstrated numerically greater benefit than anti-PD-L1 therapies, although these findings should be interpreted in light of the non-random distribution of treatment regimens across tumor types. Because chemotherapy backbones were closely linked to tumor-specific standards of care, these differences cannot be interpreted as evidence of superiority across tumor types. All combinations increased grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Differences in outcomes were observed across chemotherapy backbones; however, these findings likely reflect the combined influence of tumor-specific treatment paradigms, underlying disease biology, and potentially the chemotherapy backbone itself. Therefore, the results should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation within individual tumor types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag365
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Chemotherapy Backbone and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combinations Across Solid Tumors: A Pan-Tumor Network Meta-Analysis

Michele Iuliani, Silvia Cavaliere, Marco Russano, Sonia Simonetti et al.
The Oncologist
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Chemotherapy Backbone and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combinations Across Solid Tumors: A Pan-Tumor Network Meta-Analysis

Michele Iuliani, Silvia Cavaliere, Marco Russano, Sonia Simonetti, Roberta Scafetta, Marianna Silletta, L. Sisca, S. Calagna, Mariam Grazia Polito, Bruno Vincenzi, Francesco Pantano, Alessio Cortellini, Giuseppe Tonini
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy represent a first-line standard across multiple solid tumors; however, the contribution of chemotherapy backbone to the efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase II-III randomized trials comparing ICI-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, with the aim of evaluating whether chemotherapy backbone selection was associated with differences in clinical outcomes across tumor types. RESULTS: Thirty-nine trials including over 30,000 patients were analyzed. Detailed characteristics of included trials by tumor type are reported in Supplementary Tables S1-S6. Chemo-immunotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66-0.72) and overall survival (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.76-0.81). Among the evaluated chemotherapy backbones, platinum-pemetrexed was associated with the greatest relative survival benefit (HR 0.66), followed by platinum-taxane and fluoropyrimidine-platinum regimens (HR 0.78), whereas platinum-gemcitabine showed comparatively lower benefit (HR 0.83). Anti-PD-1 regimens demonstrated numerically greater benefit than anti-PD-L1 therapies, although these findings should be interpreted in light of the non-random distribution of treatment regimens across tumor types. Because chemotherapy backbones were closely linked to tumor-specific standards of care, these differences cannot be interpreted as evidence of superiority across tumor types. All combinations increased grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Differences in outcomes were observed across chemotherapy backbones; however, these findings likely reflect the combined influence of tumor-specific treatment paradigms, underlying disease biology, and potentially the chemotherapy backbone itself. Therefore, the results should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation within individual tumor types.

The Oncologist
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (US), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Imperial College London (GB), Institut Curie (FR), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.