Survival benefit of deceased donor kidney transplantation versus continued dialysis: international target trial emulation

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the survival benefit of deceased donor kidney transplantation versus continued dialysis according to patients' characteristics (age, diabetes, cardiovascular disease), donor quality (standard criteria donor or expanded criteria donor) and donor retrieval type (donation after brain death or donation after circulatory death). DESIGN: Target trial emulation. SETTING: European Renal Association Registry data from five countries or regions: Catalonia (Spain), Denmark, France, Norway, and the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥20 years receiving dialysis and waitlisted for a first deceased donor kidney-only transplant between 2000 and 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five year patient survival following deceased donor kidney transplantation versus continued dialysis within monthly sequential trials. Flexible parametric spline models estimated adjusted five year patient survival across recipient age. RESULTS: Of 64 036 waitlisted patients receiving dialysis, 39 244 received a deceased donor kidney transplant: 16 897 (43.1%) from a standard criteria donor/donation after brain death donor, 4324 (11.0%) from a standard criteria donor/donation after circulatory death donor, 14 799 (37.7%) from an expanded criteria donor/donation after brain death donor, and 3224 (8.2%) from an expanded criteria donor/donation after circulatory death donor. Standard criteria donor/donation after brain death and standard criteria donor/donation after circulatory death transplantation showed higher estimated five year survival compared with continued dialysis regardless of recipient age. However, the survival benefit associated with expanded criteria donor/donation after brain death transplantation and, particularly, expanded criteria donor/donation after circulatory death transplantation decreased with increasing recipient age, albeit with greater statistical uncertainty among older patients. For example, among 75 year olds, estimated five year survival following expanded criteria donor/donation after circulatory death transplantation did not differ significantly from that with continued dialysis (59% (95% confidence interval 51% to 66%) versus 55% (54% to 55%); hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.33), irrespective of diabetes or cardiovascular disease status. This group had a threefold higher early post-transplant mortality than those continuing dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Standard criteria donor kidney transplantation was consistently associated with a survival benefit compared with continued dialysis. By contrast, the survival benefit associated with expanded criteria donor transplantation declined with increasing recipient age, particularly for expanded criteria donor/donation after circulatory death transplantation, such that the oldest recipients had a smaller and more statistically uncertain estimated survival advantage over continued dialysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2026-100624
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Survival benefit of deceased donor kidney transplantation versus continued dialysis: international target trial emulation

Claus Bistrup, Belén Ponte, Nicholas C Chesnaye, Anneke Kramer et al.
1 citations
BMJ
Organ Donation and Transplantation
7.53
article

Survival benefit of deceased donor kidney transplantation versus continued dialysis: international target trial emulation

Claus Bistrup, Belén Ponte, Nicholas C Chesnaye, Anneke Kramer, Rachel Hellemans, Edouard L. Fu, Kitty J. Jager, Jaakko Helve, Shaminie Shanmugaranjan, Vianda S Stel, Camille Legeai, Émilie Savoye, Miha Arnol, Kristian Heldal, James Medcalf, Laia Oliveras, Mårten Segelmark, Dorothea Nitsch, Alberto Ortiz, Pietro Manuel Ferraro, María José Pérez-Sáez, Roser Torra, Søren S Sørensen, Anders Åsberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the survival benefit of deceased donor kidney transplantation versus continued dialysis according to patients' characteristics (age, diabetes, cardiovascular disease), donor quality (standard criteria donor or expanded criteria donor) and donor retrieval type (donation after brain death or donation after circulatory death). DESIGN: Target trial emulation. SETTING: European Renal Association Registry data from five countries or regions: Catalonia (Spain), Denmark, France, Norway, and the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥20 years receiving dialysis and waitlisted for a first deceased donor kidney-only transplant between 2000 and 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five year patient survival following deceased donor kidney transplantation versus continued dialysis within monthly sequential trials. Flexible parametric spline models estimated adjusted five year patient survival across recipient age. RESULTS: Of 64 036 waitlisted patients receiving dialysis, 39 244 received a deceased donor kidney transplant: 16 897 (43.1%) from a standard criteria donor/donation after brain death donor, 4324 (11.0%) from a standard criteria donor/donation after circulatory death donor, 14 799 (37.7%) from an expanded criteria donor/donation after brain death donor, and 3224 (8.2%) from an expanded criteria donor/donation after circulatory death donor. Standard criteria donor/donation after brain death and standard criteria donor/donation after circulatory death transplantation showed higher estimated five year survival compared with continued dialysis regardless of recipient age. However, the survival benefit associated with expanded criteria donor/donation after brain death transplantation and, particularly, expanded criteria donor/donation after circulatory death transplantation decreased with increasing recipient age, albeit with greater statistical uncertainty among older patients. For example, among 75 year olds, estimated five year survival following expanded criteria donor/donation after circulatory death transplantation did not differ significantly from that with continued dialysis (59% (95% confidence interval 51% to 66%) versus 55% (54% to 55%); hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.33), irrespective of diabetes or cardiovascular disease status. This group had a threefold higher early post-transplant mortality than those continuing dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Standard criteria donor kidney transplantation was consistently associated with a survival benefit compared with continued dialysis. By contrast, the survival benefit associated with expanded criteria donor transplantation declined with increasing recipient age, particularly for expanded criteria donor/donation after circulatory death transplantation, such that the oldest recipients had a smaller and more statistically uncertain estimated survival advantage over continued dialysis.

BMJVol. 394
University of Verona (IT), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), University of Copenhagen (DK), Oslo University Hospital (NO), NHS Blood and Transplant (GB), University of Antwerp (BE), University of Leicester (GB), University of Ljubljana (SI), Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Southern Denmark (DK), University of Oslo (NO), Lund University (SE), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI), Odense University Hospital (DK), Bellvitge University Hospital (ES), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Antwerp University Hospital (BE), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Red de Investigación Cardiovascular (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Agence de la Biomédecine (FR), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Geneva College (US), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
7.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.