The Development and Validation of a Preliminary Model for Classifying Technology Facilitated Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse by Men in the General Population

The current study aimed to develop and validate a preliminary model for classifying self-reported TF-CSEA perpetration in general population samples. Data were based on census-weighted samples of adult men from Australia ( n = 1,939), the U.K. (n = 1,506), and the U.S.A. ( n = 1,473). Penalised regression with repeated 10-fold cross-validation were used to identify predictors in the Australian sample. The final model included thirteen items related to attitudes towards TF-CSEA, use of encrypted messaging apps, online behaviours, and mental health. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUROC = 0.91), calibration (O:E = 1.10), and accuracy (Brier score = 0.04) in the Australian sample, with strong external validity in the U.S.A. (AUROC = 0.90; O:E = 0.99; Brier score = 0.05) and U.K. (AUROC = 0.85; O:E = 1.07; Brier score = 0.03) datasets. The model was translated into a nomogram, and net benefit decision curve analysis indicated that flagging men exceeding a probability threshold of 0.24 produced a net gain of 42, 17, and 43 true positives per 1,000 men assessed in Australia, the U.K., and U.S.A. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher net benefits when applied to men who work with children. This model provides proof-of-concept evidence that TF-CSEA related behaviours can be classified within anonymous survey data using non-incriminating self-report indicators in general population samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual Abuse
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632261491365
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Development and Validation of a Preliminary Model for Classifying Technology Facilitated Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse by Men in the General Population

Delanie Woodlock, Tyson Whitten, Jesse Cale, Michael Salter
Sexual Abuse
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

The Development and Validation of a Preliminary Model for Classifying Technology Facilitated Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse by Men in the General Population

Delanie Woodlock, Tyson Whitten, Jesse Cale, Michael Salter
article en

Abstract

The current study aimed to develop and validate a preliminary model for classifying self-reported TF-CSEA perpetration in general population samples. Data were based on census-weighted samples of adult men from Australia ( n = 1,939), the U.K. (n = 1,506), and the U.S.A. ( n = 1,473). Penalised regression with repeated 10-fold cross-validation were used to identify predictors in the Australian sample. The final model included thirteen items related to attitudes towards TF-CSEA, use of encrypted messaging apps, online behaviours, and mental health. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUROC = 0.91), calibration (O:E = 1.10), and accuracy (Brier score = 0.04) in the Australian sample, with strong external validity in the U.S.A. (AUROC = 0.90; O:E = 0.99; Brier score = 0.05) and U.K. (AUROC = 0.85; O:E = 1.07; Brier score = 0.03) datasets. The model was translated into a nomogram, and net benefit decision curve analysis indicated that flagging men exceeding a probability threshold of 0.24 produced a net gain of 42, 17, and 43 true positives per 1,000 men assessed in Australia, the U.K., and U.S.A. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher net benefits when applied to men who work with children. This model provides proof-of-concept evidence that TF-CSEA related behaviours can be classified within anonymous survey data using non-incriminating self-report indicators in general population samples.

Sexual Abuse
Griffith University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.