How Academic Researchers Align Values and Methodology: A Qualitative Inquiry of Equity-Informed Micro-Practices

Background Academic researchers conducting participatory research often navigate complex institutional, administrative, and funding constraints that limit their ability to actualize commitments to equitable practice. In response, many researchers adopt informal ad hoc strategies to subvert these constraints. We refer to these strategies as equity-informed micro-practices. Objectives This study aims to 1) examine the institutional and structural challenges that limit participatory research, 2) identify examples of equity-informed micro-practices, and 3) discuss limitations of equity-informed micro-practices. Methods A total of 19 semi-structured interviews were conducted with federally funded academic researchers who conducted participatory research between 2013 and 2018. Interviews were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis. Results were synthesized by a team of students, community researchers, and academic faculty. Findings Participants described several challenges related to competing demands between universities, funding bodies, and communities. These included rigid hiring systems, administrative bureaucracy, and restrictive funding guidelines. Participants responded to these challenges through a range of equity-informed micro-practices, including: 1) engaging in community-centric research design, 2) dialogical approaches that emphasized transparency and shared decision making, and 3) workarounds to institutional policies to better support communities. Despite these efforts, challenges persisted, including those related to administrative barriers, resource constraints, and communication difficulties. Conclusions Discrepancies in structural level support result in the absorption of administrative, financial, and emotional risks directly onto academic researchers who seek to enact equity in their work. Equity-informed micro-practices represent important forms of everyday resistance; however, their unsustainability underscores the need for reforms that ensure that equitable practice is supported by design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.167184
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

How Academic Researchers Align Values and Methodology: A Qualitative Inquiry of Equity-Informed Micro-Practices

Katelyn Greer, Zack Marshall, Tanvir Chowdhury Turin, Batool M. AlMousawi et al.
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

How Academic Researchers Align Values and Methodology: A Qualitative Inquiry of Equity-Informed Micro-Practices

Katelyn Greer, Zack Marshall, Tanvir Chowdhury Turin, Batool M. AlMousawi, Brenna McGillion
article en

Abstract

Background Academic researchers conducting participatory research often navigate complex institutional, administrative, and funding constraints that limit their ability to actualize commitments to equitable practice. In response, many researchers adopt informal ad hoc strategies to subvert these constraints. We refer to these strategies as equity-informed micro-practices. Objectives This study aims to 1) examine the institutional and structural challenges that limit participatory research, 2) identify examples of equity-informed micro-practices, and 3) discuss limitations of equity-informed micro-practices. Methods A total of 19 semi-structured interviews were conducted with federally funded academic researchers who conducted participatory research between 2013 and 2018. Interviews were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis. Results were synthesized by a team of students, community researchers, and academic faculty. Findings Participants described several challenges related to competing demands between universities, funding bodies, and communities. These included rigid hiring systems, administrative bureaucracy, and restrictive funding guidelines. Participants responded to these challenges through a range of equity-informed micro-practices, including: 1) engaging in community-centric research design, 2) dialogical approaches that emphasized transparency and shared decision making, and 3) workarounds to institutional policies to better support communities. Despite these efforts, challenges persisted, including those related to administrative barriers, resource constraints, and communication difficulties. Conclusions Discrepancies in structural level support result in the absorption of administrative, financial, and emotional risks directly onto academic researchers who seek to enact equity in their work. Equity-informed micro-practices represent important forms of everyday resistance; however, their unsustainability underscores the need for reforms that ensure that equitable practice is supported by design.

Journal of Participatory Research MethodsVol. 7(5)
University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), McGill University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.