Leakage Correction Cross-Section for Axial Void Channels in the 2D/1D Method

A new leakage correction method is proposed to improve the accuracy and stability of 2D/1D transport calculations, especially for designs with large void channels. The approach introduces a leakage correction cross-section that increases neutron collisions in void regions, thereby correcting flux underestimation caused by the isotropic transverse leakage (TL) approximation in the 2D/1D method. This cross-section is numerically derived from a one-group fixed-source 3D cylindrical problem and expressed as a simple function of channel radius. The leakage cross-section ensures that scalar flux in void regions more closely matches 3D transport results. Verification with microreactor problems of varying void channel sizes demonstrates significant improvements in keff and axial power distribution, along with enhanced convergence stability and fewer required iterations compared to the standard 2D/1D method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2026.2722531
Primary Topic
Hydraulic flow and structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Leakage Correction Cross-Section for Axial Void Channels in the 2D/1D Method

Brendan Kochunas, Sooyoung Choi
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Hydraulic flow and structures
article

Leakage Correction Cross-Section for Axial Void Channels in the 2D/1D Method

Brendan Kochunas, Sooyoung Choi
article en

Abstract

A new leakage correction method is proposed to improve the accuracy and stability of 2D/1D transport calculations, especially for designs with large void channels. The approach introduces a leakage correction cross-section that increases neutron collisions in void regions, thereby correcting flux underestimation caused by the isotropic transverse leakage (TL) approximation in the 2D/1D method. This cross-section is numerically derived from a one-group fixed-source 3D cylindrical problem and expressed as a simple function of channel radius. The leakage cross-section ensures that scalar flux in void regions more closely matches 3D transport results. Verification with microreactor problems of varying void channel sizes demonstrates significant improvements in keff and axial power distribution, along with enhanced convergence stability and fewer required iterations compared to the standard 2D/1D method.

Nuclear Science and Engineering
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hydraulic flow and structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leakage Correction Cross-Section for Axial Void Channels in the 2D/1D Method — Brendan Kochunas, Sooyoung Choi · Nuclear Science and Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS