Exploring patients' and family members’ perspectives on intensive care unit experiences through unsolicited feedback: A qualitative content analysis

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) stays are profound and distressing experiences for critically ill patients and their family members, often resulting in physical, psychological, cognitive, and social sequelae. Existing knowledge stems largely from structured interviews or questionnaires addressing predefined questions, potentially overlooking how individuals spontaneously and autonomously choose to express their experiences without being prompted. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to explore the content of unsolicited feedback from former critically ill patients and family members, offering a valuable source of unique, self-determined, and underexplored insights into individuals' spontaneously expressed experiences, perceptions of care, and voiced concerns. METHODS: An inductive qualitative research design was selected. Unsolicited feedback (written), spontaneously addressed directly to ICU healthcare professionals by former critically ill patients and family members, or indirectly via hospital ombudsman, was collected. FINDINGS: A total of 83 unsolicited feedbacks were received during a period of 27 months. Of these, 39 were direct unsolicited feedback and included in the qualitative analysis. Direct unsolicited feedback was most frequently submitted by family members and primarily consisted of letters of appreciation and cards notifying of a patient's demise. The analysis led to the identification of three main categories: (i) acknowledging meaningful connections; (ii) perceiving high clinical competence; and (iii) dealing with a highly challenging situation. A total of 44 indirect unsolicited feedbacks were received via the hospital ombudsman, and these were predominantly negative in nature. CONCLUSIONS: These feedbacks may support meaning-making processes following critical illness by enabling individuals to express emotions, acknowledge care received or voice concerns, and integrate highly challenging situations, thereby contributing to a sense of closure. Thus, unsolicited feedback can be understood as a self-determined expression of ongoing meaning-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Critical Care
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2026.101660
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Exploring patients' and family members’ perspectives on intensive care unit experiences through unsolicited feedback: A qualitative content analysis

Matthias Thomas Exl, Magdalena Hoffmann, Peter Nydahl, Marie‐Madlen Jeitziner et al.
Australian Critical Care
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Exploring patients' and family members’ perspectives on intensive care unit experiences through unsolicited feedback: A qualitative content analysis

Matthias Thomas Exl, Magdalena Hoffmann, Peter Nydahl, Marie‐Madlen Jeitziner, Maria Brauchle, Naira Ruch, Janine Mathier, Olivia Buchs, Isabelle Zwahlen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) stays are profound and distressing experiences for critically ill patients and their family members, often resulting in physical, psychological, cognitive, and social sequelae. Existing knowledge stems largely from structured interviews or questionnaires addressing predefined questions, potentially overlooking how individuals spontaneously and autonomously choose to express their experiences without being prompted. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to explore the content of unsolicited feedback from former critically ill patients and family members, offering a valuable source of unique, self-determined, and underexplored insights into individuals' spontaneously expressed experiences, perceptions of care, and voiced concerns. METHODS: An inductive qualitative research design was selected. Unsolicited feedback (written), spontaneously addressed directly to ICU healthcare professionals by former critically ill patients and family members, or indirectly via hospital ombudsman, was collected. FINDINGS: A total of 83 unsolicited feedbacks were received during a period of 27 months. Of these, 39 were direct unsolicited feedback and included in the qualitative analysis. Direct unsolicited feedback was most frequently submitted by family members and primarily consisted of letters of appreciation and cards notifying of a patient's demise. The analysis led to the identification of three main categories: (i) acknowledging meaningful connections; (ii) perceiving high clinical competence; and (iii) dealing with a highly challenging situation. A total of 44 indirect unsolicited feedbacks were received via the hospital ombudsman, and these were predominantly negative in nature. CONCLUSIONS: These feedbacks may support meaning-making processes following critical illness by enabling individuals to express emotions, acknowledge care received or voice concerns, and integrate highly challenging situations, thereby contributing to a sense of closure. Thus, unsolicited feedback can be understood as a self-determined expression of ongoing meaning-making.

Australian Critical CareVol. 39(5)
University of Bern (CH), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Basel (CH), Medical University of Graz (AT), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Graz University Hospital (AT), Agency for Medical Innovations (Austria) (AT), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment (AT), University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.