Democratic innovations and the field of Eurocracy: How field theory sheds light on the study of democratic innovations

Abstract This article aims to discuss the recent use of Bourdieu’s field theory in scholarship on democratic innovations. It seeks to extend these works’ effort to study democratic innovations within configurations of power relations. However, I argue that it is often unconvincing to conceptualise a field of democratic innovations or institutionalised participation when they are often too heteronomous in relation to the field of power. Instead, by extending the relevance of the Bourdieusian framework for the analysis of democratic innovations, the article invites reflection on the way promoters of democratic innovations constitute a social space – a ‘reform space’ – that is not a field but nonetheless provides resources to certain actors embedded in the field of power. The usefulness of this analytical framework is demonstrated by examining how the promoters of mini-publics at the EU level are positioned within the European field of power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Political Science
Published
2026-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1682098326100666
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Democratic innovations and the field of Eurocracy: How field theory sheds light on the study of democratic innovations

Jessy Bailly
European Political Science
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Democratic innovations and the field of Eurocracy: How field theory sheds light on the study of democratic innovations

Jessy Bailly
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to discuss the recent use of Bourdieu’s field theory in scholarship on democratic innovations. It seeks to extend these works’ effort to study democratic innovations within configurations of power relations. However, I argue that it is often unconvincing to conceptualise a field of democratic innovations or institutionalised participation when they are often too heteronomous in relation to the field of power. Instead, by extending the relevance of the Bourdieusian framework for the analysis of democratic innovations, the article invites reflection on the way promoters of democratic innovations constitute a social space – a ‘reform space’ – that is not a field but nonetheless provides resources to certain actors embedded in the field of power. The usefulness of this analytical framework is demonstrated by examining how the promoters of mini-publics at the EU level are positioned within the European field of power.

European Political Science
Institut catholique de paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Democratic innovations and the field of Eurocracy: How field theory sheds light on the study of democratic innovations — Jessy Bailly · European Political Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS