Antihypertensive Treatment and Risk of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Drug-Target Mendelian Randomization
BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, conventionally known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), affects over a quarter of the global population and lacks approved pharmacological treatments. We investigated whether elevated blood pressure (BP) is a modifiable risk factor for NAFLD and whether antihypertensive drugs could be repurposed for prevention. METHODS: We conducted whole-genome Mendelian randomization using genetic data from over 1 million individuals of European ancestry to assess systolic BP as a risk factor for NAFLD. Drug-target Mendelian randomization was used to investigate the class-specific effects of antihypertensive agents, including renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics. NAFLD was defined by persistently elevated alanine aminotransferase levels after excluding alternative liver diseases and alcohol use disorders. Genetic estimates were compared with individual-participant meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (n=358 636) and summary data from 104 antihypertensive drug trials (≈500 000 participants), using coronary heart disease as a positive control. RESULTS: A genetically proxied 5-mm Hg reduction in systolic BP was associated with an 8% lower risk of NAFLD (odds ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.90-0.94]). Renin-angiotensin system inhibition was associated with a 27% lower risk (odds ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.62-0.85]), whereas other drug classes showed no substantial associations. For coronary heart disease, effects were directionally consistent across classes in genetic and trial analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Genetically lower systolic BP is associated with reduced NAFLD risk, with renin-angiotensin system inhibition showing the most favorable association. These findings support BP lowering, particularly renin-angiotensin system inhibition, as a potential preventive strategy warranting dedicated randomized trials.
Authors
- Charalampos Sigalas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0405-1385)
- George Davey Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1407-8314)
- Reza Malekzadeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1043-3814)
- Xing Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5713-3603)
- Kazem Rahimi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-4610)
- Nathalie Conrad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-5481)
- Małgorzata Wamil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5361-2532)
- Mark Woodward (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-5296)
- Karl Smith-Byrne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-7463)
- Dexter Canoy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4493-9901)
- Dipender Gill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-7078)
- Xiong Xiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-7946)
- Ben Omega Petrazzini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-9371)
- Shishir Rao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-9416)
- Venexia Walker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-446X)
- Zeinab Bidel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8852-1622)
- Johan Sundström (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2247-8454)
- Milad Nazarzadeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-8874)
- Abbas Dehghan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-016X)
- Qianqian Yang
- Yifan Hu
Institutions
- Uppsala University (SE)
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- The George Institute for Global Health (GB)
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Great Western Hospital (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Aerospace Research Institute (IR)
- BMI Healthcare (GB)
- Nuffield Health (GB)
- Pharmacology Research Institute (US)
- The George Institute for Global Health (AU)
- Department of Medical Sciences (RU)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Medical Research Council (GB)
- KU Leuven (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2026-09-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.126.27526
- Primary Topic
- Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00