Too Fast Blocks, Too Furious Adjustments: The Satoshi Drift Level-Out

Government-issued currencies are maintained by trusted authorities such as central banks, centralised payment systems, etc. In digital currencies where “code is law”, there are no centralised authorities and many of the functionalities are replicated by algorithms. For Proof of Work (PoW) blockchains, one of the most important algorithms is the difficulty adjustment algorithm (DAA). In an ever-changing hash rate environment, the duty of a DAA is to adjust mining difficulty to ensure block rate stability. This is of paramount importance because in the short term, it controls transaction throughput and in the long term, it controls the issuance of the native coin. Designing an effective DAA can be challenging because the real hash rate of a blockchain network is unobservable and can only be estimated based on previous interblock times. For Bitcoin (BTC) things are relatively simple. The network is vast and largely immune to hash rate fluctuations so mining difficulty can be adjusted infrequently (approx. every two weeks). The remaining PoW blockchains however, such as Bitcoin Cash (BCH), are more susceptible to hash power fluctuations and benefit from a more adaptive DAA which adjusts the mining difficulty after every block. Such DAAs already exist, have been battle-tested and have proven effective at maintaining average interblock times close to the target. Nevertheless, existing DAAs tend to focus on short-term stabilisation of block production and ignore long-term stabilisation thus allowing drift accumulation. In fact, both BTC and BCH halvings of April 2024 occurred almost 9 months ahead of schedule due to this drift. To our knowledge, no DAA had systematically addressed the problem of accumulated drift prior to our earlier work originally presented in BlockTEA 2025 [29]. This paper is an extension of our work which greatly generalises, and yet paradoxically simplifies, the DAA given therein.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3848032
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Too Fast Blocks, Too Furious Adjustments: The Satoshi Drift Level-Out

William J. Knottenbelt, I Stewart, Matthieu Babak, Demetris Kyriacou
Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Too Fast Blocks, Too Furious Adjustments: The Satoshi Drift Level-Out

William J. Knottenbelt, I Stewart, Matthieu Babak, Demetris Kyriacou
article en

Abstract

Government-issued currencies are maintained by trusted authorities such as central banks, centralised payment systems, etc. In digital currencies where “code is law”, there are no centralised authorities and many of the functionalities are replicated by algorithms. For Proof of Work (PoW) blockchains, one of the most important algorithms is the difficulty adjustment algorithm (DAA). In an ever-changing hash rate environment, the duty of a DAA is to adjust mining difficulty to ensure block rate stability. This is of paramount importance because in the short term, it controls transaction throughput and in the long term, it controls the issuance of the native coin. Designing an effective DAA can be challenging because the real hash rate of a blockchain network is unobservable and can only be estimated based on previous interblock times. For Bitcoin (BTC) things are relatively simple. The network is vast and largely immune to hash rate fluctuations so mining difficulty can be adjusted infrequently (approx. every two weeks). The remaining PoW blockchains however, such as Bitcoin Cash (BCH), are more susceptible to hash power fluctuations and benefit from a more adaptive DAA which adjusts the mining difficulty after every block. Such DAAs already exist, have been battle-tested and have proven effective at maintaining average interblock times close to the target. Nevertheless, existing DAAs tend to focus on short-term stabilisation of block production and ignore long-term stabilisation thus allowing drift accumulation. In fact, both BTC and BCH halvings of April 2024 occurred almost 9 months ahead of schedule due to this drift. To our knowledge, no DAA had systematically addressed the problem of accumulated drift prior to our earlier work originally presented in BlockTEA 2025 [29]. This paper is an extension of our work which greatly generalises, and yet paradoxically simplifies, the DAA given therein.

Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice
École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.