Feeling rich or looking rich? Self-perceived vs socially-perceived relative income

Individuals may care about status both because of how they view their own position and because of how others perceive it. We compare these two dimensions using five hypothetical discrete-choice experiments that separately vary absolute outcomes, self-perceived standing, and socially-perceived standing in the domains of income, academic performance, and car safety. The analysis sample includes 4934 U.S. respondents and two elicitation tasks: a non-incentivized own-choice task and an incentivized coordination game in which respondents are rewarded for predicting the modal choice. Across four of the five experimental conditions, socially-perceived standing enters positively, while self-perceived standing is either negative or statistically indistinguishable from zero. The exception is the income own-choice condition, where the pattern reverses—a result that warrants further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105778
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Feeling rich or looking rich? Self-perceived vs socially-perceived relative income

Katsunori Yamada, Hitoshi Shigeoka, Nicolás Bottan, Ricardo Perez-Truglia
Journal of Public Economics
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Feeling rich or looking rich? Self-perceived vs socially-perceived relative income

Katsunori Yamada, Hitoshi Shigeoka, Nicolás Bottan, Ricardo Perez-Truglia
article en

Abstract

Individuals may care about status both because of how they view their own position and because of how others perceive it. We compare these two dimensions using five hypothetical discrete-choice experiments that separately vary absolute outcomes, self-perceived standing, and socially-perceived standing in the domains of income, academic performance, and car safety. The analysis sample includes 4934 U.S. respondents and two elicitation tasks: a non-incentivized own-choice task and an incentivized coordination game in which respondents are rewarded for predicting the modal choice. Across four of the five experimental conditions, socially-perceived standing enters positively, while self-perceived standing is either negative or statistically indistinguishable from zero. The exception is the income own-choice condition, where the pattern reverses—a result that warrants further research.

Journal of Public EconomicsVol. 262
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Simon Fraser University (CA), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), Cornell University (US), The University of Tokyo (JP), Kindai University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feeling rich or looking rich? Self-perceived vs socially-perceived relative income — Katsunori Yamada, Hitoshi Shigeoka, et al. · Journal of Public Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS