Risk of non-fatal MACE in patients treated with zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib: a propensity-matched analysis

Abstract Aims The comparative cardiovascular toxicity profile of zanubrutinib versus acalabrutinib remains poorly characterised, even though it is increasingly influencing clinical decision-making regarding BTK inhibitor (BTK-I) prescription. The main aim of this study was to examine the risk of developing non-fatal MACE (composite of acute myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism and heart failure) in patients exposed to zanubrutinib compared with those exposed to acalabrutinib. Secondary endpoints included comparative risk of all-cause mortality, incident intra-cerebral haemorrhages, major bleedings, incident atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension, and a composite of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest (VT/VF/cardiac arrest). Methods and results Using the TriNetX research network database, a retrospective cohort of adult patients (≥18 years) previously diagnosed with a B-cell malignancy in whom a first BTK-I introduction occurred between October 31, 2017 and October 31, 2025 was established. After propensity score matching across 60 covariates, Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the 2 matched groups. Results were summarised with the use of Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Follow-up started from 1 day after first BTK-I introduction and continued over a 5-year follow-up period. During a mean follow-up of 1.7±1.4 years, no significant difference was observed in the risk of non-fatal MACE between zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib groups in the matched cohort (n=4,589 in each group; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.898–1.093). The risks of all-cause mortality and major bleedings were significantly lower in the zanubrutinib group when compared to the acalabrutinib group (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.737–0.915 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.878–0.982; respectively). No significant differences were observed in the risk of intra-cerebral haemorrhages, hypertension, AF and VT/VF/cardiac. Conclusion The risk of developing non-fatal MACE associated with zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies does not appear to diverge significantly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal – Cardio-Oncology
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjco/aabag008
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Risk of non-fatal MACE in patients treated with zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib: a propensity-matched analysis

Thibault Lenormand, Jonaz Font, Laurent Fauchier, Arnaud Bisson et al.
European Heart Journal – Cardio-Oncology
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
article

Risk of non-fatal MACE in patients treated with zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib: a propensity-matched analysis

Thibault Lenormand, Jonaz Font, Laurent Fauchier, Arnaud Bisson, Joachim Alexandre, Paul Milliez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims The comparative cardiovascular toxicity profile of zanubrutinib versus acalabrutinib remains poorly characterised, even though it is increasingly influencing clinical decision-making regarding BTK inhibitor (BTK-I) prescription. The main aim of this study was to examine the risk of developing non-fatal MACE (composite of acute myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism and heart failure) in patients exposed to zanubrutinib compared with those exposed to acalabrutinib. Secondary endpoints included comparative risk of all-cause mortality, incident intra-cerebral haemorrhages, major bleedings, incident atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension, and a composite of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest (VT/VF/cardiac arrest). Methods and results Using the TriNetX research network database, a retrospective cohort of adult patients (≥18 years) previously diagnosed with a B-cell malignancy in whom a first BTK-I introduction occurred between October 31, 2017 and October 31, 2025 was established. After propensity score matching across 60 covariates, Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the 2 matched groups. Results were summarised with the use of Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Follow-up started from 1 day after first BTK-I introduction and continued over a 5-year follow-up period. During a mean follow-up of 1.7±1.4 years, no significant difference was observed in the risk of non-fatal MACE between zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib groups in the matched cohort (n=4,589 in each group; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.898–1.093). The risks of all-cause mortality and major bleedings were significantly lower in the zanubrutinib group when compared to the acalabrutinib group (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.737–0.915 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.878–0.982; respectively). No significant differences were observed in the risk of intra-cerebral haemorrhages, hypertension, AF and VT/VF/cardiac. Conclusion The risk of developing non-fatal MACE associated with zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies does not appear to diverge significantly.

European Heart Journal – Cardio-Oncology
Inserm (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR), Normandie Université (FR), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.