Correlation-Aware Pricing of Combo Contracts: A Copula-Based Approach with Out-of-Sample Validation and Quoting-Engine Evidence

Combination contracts — parlays, same-game multi-leg bets, and combo positions in prediction markets —are frequently priced under a naive independence assumption that multiplies the marginal probabilities ofeach leg. This assumption is only valid when the underlying legs are statistically independent, which is rarelytrue in practice. Using hourly and daily return data for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) as a liquid, publiclyaccessible proxy for correlated event legs, we quantify the mispricing induced by the independenceassumption, correct it using Gaussian and Student's t copula models, and validate the correction out-ofsample. We find that naive independence pricing underestimates the joint probability of a simultaneous 1%move in both assets by a factor of approximately 32, and that a t-copula model recovers the true probabilitywithin 6.5% of the empirical value, both in-sample and out-of-sample. Converting probabilities to contractprices, we show that a market maker pricing such a combo naively would lose approximately 97% ofcollected premium in expectation. Finally, we build a simplified inventory-aware quoting engine and show,via a paired experimental design across 40 independent historical windows, that copula-based quotingoutperforms naive quoting in every trial (p < 10¹¹), with a small but highly consistent per-trial P&L; advantage.We discuss the limitations of this design and directions for extension to live order-book and prediction-marketdata.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22816727
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Correlation-Aware Pricing of Combo Contracts: A Copula-Based Approach with Out-of-Sample Validation and Quoting-Engine Evidence

Keerat Rashid
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Correlation-Aware Pricing of Combo Contracts: A Copula-Based Approach with Out-of-Sample Validation and Quoting-Engine Evidence

Keerat Rashid
article en

Abstract

Combination contracts — parlays, same-game multi-leg bets, and combo positions in prediction markets —are frequently priced under a naive independence assumption that multiplies the marginal probabilities ofeach leg. This assumption is only valid when the underlying legs are statistically independent, which is rarelytrue in practice. Using hourly and daily return data for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) as a liquid, publiclyaccessible proxy for correlated event legs, we quantify the mispricing induced by the independenceassumption, correct it using Gaussian and Student's t copula models, and validate the correction out-ofsample. We find that naive independence pricing underestimates the joint probability of a simultaneous 1%move in both assets by a factor of approximately 32, and that a t-copula model recovers the true probabilitywithin 6.5% of the empirical value, both in-sample and out-of-sample. Converting probabilities to contractprices, we show that a market maker pricing such a combo naively would lose approximately 97% ofcollected premium in expectation. Finally, we build a simplified inventory-aware quoting engine and show,via a paired experimental design across 40 independent historical windows, that copula-based quotingoutperforms naive quoting in every trial (p < 10¹¹), with a small but highly consistent per-trial P&L; advantage.We discuss the limitations of this design and directions for extension to live order-book and prediction-marketdata.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.