Do we need a Noah’s Ark to innovate? The value of biodiversity sampling for biomimetics and bioinspiration

Bioinspiration and biomimetics rely on biological diversity to generate novel design solutions, yet research remains heavily biased toward a small number of well-studied model organisms, often limiting innovation to incremental advances. A major challenge lies in determining how much biodiversity must be sampled to effectively capture the range of morphologies relevant to biological function and extract design principles. Here, we use echinoid (sea urchin) spine microarchitectures as a case study to quantify how biodiversity sampling influences the morphospace, a quantitative representation of morphological diversity. Micro-computed tomography data were collected from 177 species, representing ~50% of total regular non-cidaroid echinoid diversity, with systematic coverage across all taxonomic levels. Mimetica, an open-source Python package, was developed to extract and analyse radial and phase profiles that define spine microarchitecture from two-dimensional image stacks. Morphospace analysis revealed rapid saturation: approximately 50% of the morphospace was recovered by sampling 20% of morphotypes-distinct spine architectures, typically one per species-with diminishing returns at higher sampling. The morphospace was largely defined by a small subset of morphotypes that shape the boundaries of the convex hull, concentrated in relatively few genera, while most species contributed negligibly to overall hull volume. Sampling a single morphotype per genus recovered ~72% of the morphospace, demonstrating that broad taxonomic coverage is sufficient to capture major axes of variation, while exhaustive species-level coverage adds little benefit. Our results provide the first empirical evidence that opportunistic, low-diversity sampling is insufficient to recover the full extent of morphological variation. Systematic, taxonomically informed sampling, rather than a focus on individual species, is essential for capturing the diversity that underpins biomimetic and bioinspired innovation. Additionally, future research should prioritize the identification of morphologically extreme, convex hull-defining taxa, as these approximate the limits of morphological variation and are more likely to translate into distinct functional outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aea957
Primary Topic
Echinoderm biology and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Do we need a Noah’s Ark to innovate? The value of biodiversity sampling for biomimetics and bioinspiration

Auke Barnhoorn, Chris Broeckhoven, Alexander Hadjiivanov, Richard Johnston et al.
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
Echinoderm biology and ecology
article

Do we need a Noah’s Ark to innovate? The value of biodiversity sampling for biomimetics and bioinspiration

Auke Barnhoorn, Chris Broeckhoven, Alexander Hadjiivanov, Richard Johnston, Ellen Meijvogel-de Koning
article en

Abstract

Bioinspiration and biomimetics rely on biological diversity to generate novel design solutions, yet research remains heavily biased toward a small number of well-studied model organisms, often limiting innovation to incremental advances. A major challenge lies in determining how much biodiversity must be sampled to effectively capture the range of morphologies relevant to biological function and extract design principles. Here, we use echinoid (sea urchin) spine microarchitectures as a case study to quantify how biodiversity sampling influences the morphospace, a quantitative representation of morphological diversity. Micro-computed tomography data were collected from 177 species, representing ~50% of total regular non-cidaroid echinoid diversity, with systematic coverage across all taxonomic levels. Mimetica, an open-source Python package, was developed to extract and analyse radial and phase profiles that define spine microarchitecture from two-dimensional image stacks. Morphospace analysis revealed rapid saturation: approximately 50% of the morphospace was recovered by sampling 20% of morphotypes-distinct spine architectures, typically one per species-with diminishing returns at higher sampling. The morphospace was largely defined by a small subset of morphotypes that shape the boundaries of the convex hull, concentrated in relatively few genera, while most species contributed negligibly to overall hull volume. Sampling a single morphotype per genus recovered ~72% of the morphospace, demonstrating that broad taxonomic coverage is sufficient to capture major axes of variation, while exhaustive species-level coverage adds little benefit. Our results provide the first empirical evidence that opportunistic, low-diversity sampling is insufficient to recover the full extent of morphological variation. Systematic, taxonomically informed sampling, rather than a focus on individual species, is essential for capturing the diversity that underpins biomimetic and bioinspired innovation. Additionally, future research should prioritize the identification of morphologically extreme, convex hull-defining taxa, as these approximate the limits of morphological variation and are more likely to translate into distinct functional outcomes.

Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
Swansea University (GB), European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Echinoderm biology and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.