Developing a Qualitative Framework for Analyzing Higher Education Leadership's Role in Structured-Based AI Integration Strategies Addressing Strategic and Ethical Dimensions

Developing a Qualitative Framework for Structured AI Integration in Higher Education This study introduces a qualitative framework that helps universities examine how higher education leadership addresses the strategic and ethical dimensions of artificial intelligence integration. The analysis draws on institutional documents from eight universities and identifies four leadership‑centered dimensions: Institutional Direction, Ethical Responsibility, Institutional Capacity, and Policy Consistency. “Higher education institutions need a consistent way to examine how leadership addresses the strategic and ethical dimensions of artificial intelligence integration.” The framework provides a structured way to evaluate how institutional leaders communicate expectations, establish responsibilities, and align AI strategies with academic integrity, fairness, transparency, and responsible use. It supports researchers and administrators seeking to understand how leadership decisions shape institutional AI strategies across academic and administrative settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22812467
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Developing a Qualitative Framework for Analyzing Higher Education Leadership's Role in Structured-Based AI Integration Strategies Addressing Strategic and Ethical Dimensions

MopelolaO Fatile
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Developing a Qualitative Framework for Analyzing Higher Education Leadership's Role in Structured-Based AI Integration Strategies Addressing Strategic and Ethical Dimensions

MopelolaO Fatile
article en

Abstract

Developing a Qualitative Framework for Structured AI Integration in Higher Education This study introduces a qualitative framework that helps universities examine how higher education leadership addresses the strategic and ethical dimensions of artificial intelligence integration. The analysis draws on institutional documents from eight universities and identifies four leadership‑centered dimensions: Institutional Direction, Ethical Responsibility, Institutional Capacity, and Policy Consistency. “Higher education institutions need a consistent way to examine how leadership addresses the strategic and ethical dimensions of artificial intelligence integration.” The framework provides a structured way to evaluate how institutional leaders communicate expectations, establish responsibilities, and align AI strategies with academic integrity, fairness, transparency, and responsible use. It supports researchers and administrators seeking to understand how leadership decisions shape institutional AI strategies across academic and administrative settings.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Grand Canyon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing a Qualitative Framework for Analyzing Higher Education Leadership's Role in Structured-Based AI Integration Strategies Addressing Strategic and Ethical Dimensions — MopelolaO Fatile · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS