Ambidexterity Across Levels and Over Time

Ambidexterity is a multilevel capacity for balancing competing imperatives such as adaptability and alignment. If left unmanaged, these imperatives create tensions that challenge performance and continued viability. The construct of ambidexterity has a long and varied history in the organizational literature, generating hundreds of articles, meta-analyses, and literature reviews. Findings regarding performance effects are mixed, and research has been plagued by fragmentation due to different levels of analysis and operationalizations, and samples derived from vastly different economic and industry environments. Many open issues remain, with critics arguing for greater conceptual clarity, multilevel frameworks, and more contemporary perspectives that account for an ever-changing organizational environment. Our review assesses progress in the field, integrating macro-, meso- and micro-level approaches to ambidexterity, providing particular attention to recent research on team- and individual-level applications of the concept. In doing so, we aim to expand our understanding of ambidexterity to include an embedded, contingent, episodic perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-040225-083937
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Ambidexterity Across Levels and Over Time

Cristina B. Gibson, Tad Machrowicz
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Ambidexterity Across Levels and Over Time

Cristina B. Gibson, Tad Machrowicz
article en

Abstract

Ambidexterity is a multilevel capacity for balancing competing imperatives such as adaptability and alignment. If left unmanaged, these imperatives create tensions that challenge performance and continued viability. The construct of ambidexterity has a long and varied history in the organizational literature, generating hundreds of articles, meta-analyses, and literature reviews. Findings regarding performance effects are mixed, and research has been plagued by fragmentation due to different levels of analysis and operationalizations, and samples derived from vastly different economic and industry environments. Many open issues remain, with critics arguing for greater conceptual clarity, multilevel frameworks, and more contemporary perspectives that account for an ever-changing organizational environment. Our review assesses progress in the field, integrating macro-, meso- and micro-level approaches to ambidexterity, providing particular attention to recent research on team- and individual-level applications of the concept. In doing so, we aim to expand our understanding of ambidexterity to include an embedded, contingent, episodic perspective.

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Pepperdine University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ambidexterity Across Levels and Over Time — Cristina B. Gibson, Tad Machrowicz · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS