Interdisciplinary Research Approach: The Structural Paradox of Constitutional Oaths and Systemic Perjury in Modern State Architecture

CERN via ZENODO Manuscript Type: Legal Treatise & Formal Constitutional Complaint · Title: Interdisciplinary Research Approach: The Structural Paradox of Constitutional Oaths and Systemic Perjury in Modern State Architecture Author: Joerg Matthias SeidlState Certified Mechanical Engineering Technician / Certified Technical Business Economist Affiliation: Independent Researcher, Schwanstetten, Germany Corresponding Author: Joerg Matthias SeidlSimon-Premser-Weg 390596 SchwanstettenGermany Phone: +49 170 3696565Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0009-0000-3357-2767 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22809895, Version 1 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22809894, all Versions Keywords: Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, Perjury in Office, State Liability, Official Immunity, Legal Paradox, Asymmetric Subjection, Public Law, Executive Discretion, Civil Recourse, Open Science, Judicial Administration, Sovereign Protection, Civil Rights Restriction, State Monopoly on Force, Interdisciplinary Legal Studies, Human Rights, International Law, Public International Law. Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The work was entirely independently funded by the author. Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest associated with this work.