Plan Negotiation through Cooperativeness Characterisation in Human-Robot Teams
This paper presents a cognitive characterisation framework for human-robot plan negotiation (HRPN) that situates proposals within the cooperativeness space , a cognitive model that separates stakeholder-directed concern from agent valuation and behavioural factors. This framework is instantiated in a non-critical service-robot scenario and evaluated through a two-phase experimental study in the human-robot collaborative search (HRCS) domain: a first phase to elicit human valuation and a second phase to examine real-time plan negotiation dynamics. This exploratory study characterises, for the first time, plan negotiation in a human-robot dyad through the lens of individual and collective stakeholder concern alignment. Key findings show that participants’ initial proposals did not maximise perceived utility; negotiated outcomes exhibited weak Pareto dominance over unilateral human proposals in both the utility and cooperativeness spaces; and collaboration perception was grounded on multiple factors. These findings challenge common assumptions in negotiation modelling and provide a representational foundation for future design of collaborative human-robot systems.
Authors
- Víctor Sánchez-Anguix (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4851-0037)
- Pablo Jiménez Schlegl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3627-4938)
- Alberto Sanfeliu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3868-9678)
- Marc Dalmasso (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1734-7863)
- Anaís Garrell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-0723)
Institutions
- Institut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial (ES)
- Centro Tecnológico de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación en tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (TIC) (ES)
- Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
- Published
- 2026-09-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3846181
- Primary Topic
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00