The role of pitch in the vocal communication of intentions

{"Intonation,":[0],"the":[1,16,64,90,93,118,127,172,184],"variation":[2],"of":[3,18,24,52,92,98,121,133,143,158,174],"pitch":[4,19,94,103,122,147,175],"in":[5,96,105,135,149,164,176,188],"speech,":[6],"helps":[7],"listeners":[8,71,87,144],"understand":[9],"speakers'":[10],"communicative":[11],"intentions.":[12,39,137],"This":[13],"study":[14],"examines":[15],"role":[17,120,132,173],"information":[20],"at":[21],"different":[22,150],"levels":[23],"granularity-spanning":[25],"specific":[26],"(discrete":[27],"contours),":[28],"more":[29],"flexible":[30],"(general":[31],"contour":[32,95,112],"shape),":[33],"and":[34,58,81,101,160,182],"general":[35],"(averaged":[36],"pitch)-in":[37],"communicating":[38,136],"We":[40],"first":[41],"used":[42],"a":[43,68,114],"reverse":[44],"correlation":[45],"approach":[46],"to":[47,63,107],"identify":[48],"people's":[49],"mental":[50],"representations":[51],"two":[53],"contrasting":[54],"intentions":[55],"-":[56,60],"criticism":[57,80],"suggestion":[59],"when":[61],"listening":[62],"word":[65],"\\"beer.\\"":[66],"In":[67],"second":[69],"experiment,":[70],"rated":[72],"how":[73],"much":[74],"each":[75],"resulting":[76],"pattern":[77],"sounded":[78],"like":[79],"suggestion.":[82],"Statistical":[83],"models":[84],"revealed":[85],"that":[86],"rely":[88],"on":[89],"shape":[91],"terms":[97],"its":[99,180],"spikiness":[100],"overall":[102],"direction,":[104],"addition":[106],"mean":[108],"pitch,":[109],"while":[110],"precise":[111],"plays":[113],"minor":[115],"role,":[116],"supporting":[117],"relevant":[119],"dynamics":[123],"as":[124,126],"well":[125],"inferential":[128],"(rather":[129],"than":[130],"referential)":[131],"intonation":[134],"Notably,":[138],"we":[139],"found":[140],"distinct":[141],"groups":[142,157],"who":[145],"use":[146],"characteristics":[148],"ways,":[151],"highlighting":[152],"both":[153],"shared":[154],"understanding":[155],"(within":[156],"listeners)":[159],"substantial":[161],"interindividual":[162],"differences":[163],"processing":[165],"social":[166],"pragmatic":[167],"cues.":[168],"These":[169],"findings":[170],"clarify":[171],"intention":[177],"communication,":[178],"reveal":[179],"complexity,":[181],"highlight":[183],"potential":[185],"for":[186],"miscommunication":[187],"everyday":[189],"interactions.":[190]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106714
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The role of pitch in the vocal communication of intentions

Daniela Sammler, Hanna Ringer, Pauline Larrouy-Maestri, David Poeppel
Cognition
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

The role of pitch in the vocal communication of intentions

Daniela Sammler, Hanna Ringer, Pauline Larrouy-Maestri, David Poeppel
article en

Abstract

Intonation, the variation of pitch in speech, helps listeners understand speakers' communicative intentions. This study examines the role of pitch information at different levels of granularity-spanning specific (discrete contours), more flexible (general contour shape), and general (averaged pitch)-in communicating intentions. We first used a reverse correlation approach to identify people's mental representations of two contrasting intentions - criticism and suggestion - when listening to the word "beer." In a second experiment, listeners rated how much each resulting pattern sounded like criticism and suggestion. Statistical models revealed that listeners rely on the shape of the pitch contour in terms of its spikiness and overall pitch direction, in addition to mean pitch, while precise contour plays a minor role, supporting the relevant role of pitch dynamics as well as the inferential (rather than referential) role of intonation in communicating intentions. Notably, we found distinct groups of listeners who use pitch characteristics in different ways, highlighting both shared understanding (within groups of listeners) and substantial interindividual differences in processing social pragmatic cues. These findings clarify the role of pitch in intention communication, reveal its complexity, and highlight the potential for miscommunication in everyday interactions.

CognitionVol. 278
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.