Supernormal Respondents Report Fewer Immature and Neurotic Defenses Compared to Credible Respondents

{"AIMS:":[0],"Defense":[1,61],"mechanisms":[2],"are":[3,18,25],"unconscious":[4],"strategies":[5],"used":[6],"to":[7,27,30,38,117,143],"manage":[8],"anxiety":[9],"triggered":[10],"by":[11],"unpleasant":[12],"emotions,":[13],"thoughts,":[14],"or":[15],"circumstances.":[16],"They":[17],"commonly":[19],"assessed":[20],"through":[21],"self-report":[22,141],"questionnaires,":[23],"which":[24,39],"known":[26],"be":[28,118],"susceptible":[29],"response":[31,46,137],"biases.":[32],"This":[33],"study":[34],"examined":[35],"the":[36,60,66,132],"extent":[37],"supernormality,":[40],"an":[41],"extreme":[42],"form":[43],"of":[44,50,56,95,106,123,134],"positive":[45],"bias,":[47],"affects":[48],"self-reports":[49],"defense":[51,108,145],"mechanisms.":[52,146],"METHODS:":[53],"A":[54],"total":[55],"840":[57],"participants":[58],"completed":[59],"Style":[62],"Questionnaire":[63],"(DSQ)":[64],"and":[65,78,98,126],"Supernormality":[67,115],"Scale-Revised":[68],"(SS-R).":[69],"Participants":[70],"were":[71],"categorized":[72],"into":[73],"a":[74,79],"\\"supernormal\\"":[75],"group":[76,81],"(26.4%)":[77],"\\"credible\\"":[80],"(73.6%)":[82],"based":[83],"on":[84],"their":[85],"SS-R":[86],"scores.":[87],"RESULTS:":[88],"Supernormal":[89],"respondents":[90],"reported":[91],"significantly":[92],"lower":[93,104],"use":[94,105],"both":[96,124],"neurotic":[97],"immature":[99],"defenses":[100],"as":[101,103],"well":[102],"most":[107],"styles,":[109],"compared":[110],"with":[111,120],"credible":[112],"respondents.":[113],"CONCLUSIONS:":[114],"seems":[116],"associated":[119],"systematic":[121],"under-reporting":[122],"adaptive":[125],"maladaptive":[127],"defenses.":[128],"These":[129],"findings":[130],"highlight":[131],"importance":[133],"accounting":[135],"for":[136],"bias":[138],"when":[139],"using":[140],"measures":[142],"assess":[144]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000001898
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Supernormal Respondents Report Fewer Immature and Neurotic Defenses Compared to Credible Respondents

Ruth Van der Hallen, Naz Kapoğlu, Natacha Henriquez
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Supernormal Respondents Report Fewer Immature and Neurotic Defenses Compared to Credible Respondents

Ruth Van der Hallen, Naz Kapoğlu, Natacha Henriquez
article en

Abstract

AIMS: Defense mechanisms are unconscious strategies used to manage anxiety triggered by unpleasant emotions, thoughts, or circumstances. They are commonly assessed through self-report questionnaires, which are known to be susceptible to response biases. This study examined the extent to which supernormality, an extreme form of positive response bias, affects self-reports of defense mechanisms. METHODS: A total of 840 participants completed the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) and the Supernormality Scale-Revised (SS-R). Participants were categorized into a "supernormal" group (26.4%) and a "credible" group (73.6%) based on their SS-R scores. RESULTS: Supernormal respondents reported significantly lower use of both neurotic and immature defenses as well as lower use of most defense styles, compared with credible respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Supernormality seems to be associated with systematic under-reporting of both adaptive and maladaptive defenses. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for response bias when using self-report measures to assess defense mechanisms.

The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.