Quantitative Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Mapping and nTMS-Guided Corticospinal Tractography in Healthy Individuals and Patients with Motor-Eloquent Brain Tumors

Background/Objectives: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) enables presurgical motor mapping, while nTMS-seeded diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) delineates the corticospinal tract (CST). We compared cortical and tractography measures between healthy individuals and patients with motor-eloquent brain tumors and between patient hemispheres. Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers and 18 patients underwent first dorsal interosseous (FDI) mapping at 110% resting motor threshold (rMT). Motor map metrics, maximum FDI motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, and nTMS-seeded CST measures were analyzed; hotspot and center-of-gravity (CoG) dispersion were assessed in common space. DTI metrics were available for 13 healthy volunteers and 13 patients. Results: Consistent with previous nTMS literature, patients showed impaired motor performance and suprathreshold corticospinal output, with lower grip strength, maximum FDI MEP amplitude, and map volume than controls. rMT did not differ significantly, indicating that threshold excitability may be unrevealing despite motor system dysfunction. Notably, the contralateral patient hemisphere also differed from controls in grip strength, maximum FDI MEP amplitude, reconstructed CST fiber length, and mean axial diffusivity, while these measures did not differ significantly between the ipsilateral and contralateral patient hemispheres. CoG dispersion was greater in patients, whereas hotspot dispersion was not. Conclusions: The study confirms tumor-associated impairment of motor performance and suprathreshold corticospinal output while identifying two potentially novel observations: abnormalities extending to the apparently unaffected hemisphere and increased heterogeneity of the amplitude-weighted motor map center. Notably, contralateral abnormalities may reflect bilateral network changes or patient-related factors, rather than isolated contralateral CST pathology. Independent healthy controls may therefore provide information not captured by within-patient hemispheric comparisons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16090986
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantitative Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Mapping and nTMS-Guided Corticospinal Tractography in Healthy Individuals and Patients with Motor-Eloquent Brain Tumors

Konstantinos Pastiadis, Dimitris Kugiumtzis, Ioannis Vlachos, Nikolaos Foroglou et al.
Brain Sciences
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Quantitative Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Mapping and nTMS-Guided Corticospinal Tractography in Healthy Individuals and Patients with Motor-Eloquent Brain Tumors

Konstantinos Pastiadis, Dimitris Kugiumtzis, Ioannis Vlachos, Nikolaos Foroglou, Evangelia Chatzikyriakou, Christos A. Frantzidιs, Vasilios Κ. Kimiskidis, Georgios Feretos, Ioannis Patsalas, Vasileios Papaliagkas, Konstantinos Kouskouras
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) enables presurgical motor mapping, while nTMS-seeded diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) delineates the corticospinal tract (CST). We compared cortical and tractography measures between healthy individuals and patients with motor-eloquent brain tumors and between patient hemispheres. Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers and 18 patients underwent first dorsal interosseous (FDI) mapping at 110% resting motor threshold (rMT). Motor map metrics, maximum FDI motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, and nTMS-seeded CST measures were analyzed; hotspot and center-of-gravity (CoG) dispersion were assessed in common space. DTI metrics were available for 13 healthy volunteers and 13 patients. Results: Consistent with previous nTMS literature, patients showed impaired motor performance and suprathreshold corticospinal output, with lower grip strength, maximum FDI MEP amplitude, and map volume than controls. rMT did not differ significantly, indicating that threshold excitability may be unrevealing despite motor system dysfunction. Notably, the contralateral patient hemisphere also differed from controls in grip strength, maximum FDI MEP amplitude, reconstructed CST fiber length, and mean axial diffusivity, while these measures did not differ significantly between the ipsilateral and contralateral patient hemispheres. CoG dispersion was greater in patients, whereas hotspot dispersion was not. Conclusions: The study confirms tumor-associated impairment of motor performance and suprathreshold corticospinal output while identifying two potentially novel observations: abnormalities extending to the apparently unaffected hemisphere and increased heterogeneity of the amplitude-weighted motor map center. Notably, contralateral abnormalities may reflect bilateral network changes or patient-related factors, rather than isolated contralateral CST pathology. Independent healthy controls may therefore provide information not captured by within-patient hemispheric comparisons.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(9)
International Hellenic University (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), AHEPA University Hospital (GR), University of Lincoln (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.