Doxycycline pre-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPrEP) versus doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) for preventing bacterial sexually transmitted infections in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) and transgender women: protoco

The global incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia, is rising at an unprecedented rate. This trend is particularly concerning among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) and transgender women, who experience disproportionately high rates of infection. Despite ongoing public health efforts (e.g. condoms), bacterial STI rates continue to increase, signaling an urgent need for new prevention strategies. Doxycycline prophylaxis has shown potential for STI prevention, with two primary strategies under investigation: post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP), taken within 72 h of condomless sex, and pre-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPrEP), generally taken daily. Early studies suggest doxyPEP significantly reduces bacterial STIs, but data on doxyPrEP remains limited. These two strategies have never been directly compared in a head-to-head trial, leaving a crucial gap in understanding their relative efficacy. The Doxycycline Intervention for STI Chemoprophylaxis (DISCO) study is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing doxyPrEP (100 mg daily) versus doxyPEP (200 mg after exposure, within 72 h) for the prevention of bacterial STIs among GBM and transgender women. Participants are recruited from Canadian clinical sites in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Hamilton, Ottawa, and Montreal, and followed for 60 weeks. The primary objective is to establish the non-inferiority of doxyPrEP versus doxyPEP in preventing incident bacterial STIs (syphilis, gonorrhea, and/or chlamydia). Secondary objectives include evaluating the frequency of bacterial STIs, treatment adherence, tolerability, safety, changes in sexual behaviour, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles among participants. This study is the first clinical trial to directly compare doxyPrEP and doxyPEP, addressing the gaps in current evidence. The results will provide critical insights into the efficacy, safety, and AMR implications of these interventions and inform best practices for STI prevention among high-risk populations. The findings have the potential to identify the optimal strategy for reducing the burden of bacterial STIs while minimizing the risks of AMR and associated complications. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04762134. Registered 02 February 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04762134 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09916-9
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Doxycycline pre-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPrEP) versus doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) for preventing bacterial sexually transmitted infections in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) and transgender women: protoco

Mark Hull, Kevin Woodward, Adam Burgener, Marc G. Romney et al.
Trials
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Doxycycline pre-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPrEP) versus doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) for preventing bacterial sexually transmitted infections in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) and transgender women: protoco

Mark Hull, Kevin Woodward, Adam Burgener, Marc G. Romney, Paul Macpherson, Linwei Wang, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Troy Grennan, Terry Lee, J Gill, Jason Wong, Ramin Azmin, Maya Tharp, Joshua Edward, Muhammed Morshed, Sharmistha Mishra, Mark Gilbert, Joseph Cox, Ann N. Burchell, Darrell H. Tan, David M. Moore, Caley Shukalek, Joel Singer, Saira Mohammed
article en

Abstract

The global incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia, is rising at an unprecedented rate. This trend is particularly concerning among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) and transgender women, who experience disproportionately high rates of infection. Despite ongoing public health efforts (e.g. condoms), bacterial STI rates continue to increase, signaling an urgent need for new prevention strategies. Doxycycline prophylaxis has shown potential for STI prevention, with two primary strategies under investigation: post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP), taken within 72 h of condomless sex, and pre-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPrEP), generally taken daily. Early studies suggest doxyPEP significantly reduces bacterial STIs, but data on doxyPrEP remains limited. These two strategies have never been directly compared in a head-to-head trial, leaving a crucial gap in understanding their relative efficacy. The Doxycycline Intervention for STI Chemoprophylaxis (DISCO) study is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing doxyPrEP (100 mg daily) versus doxyPEP (200 mg after exposure, within 72 h) for the prevention of bacterial STIs among GBM and transgender women. Participants are recruited from Canadian clinical sites in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Hamilton, Ottawa, and Montreal, and followed for 60 weeks. The primary objective is to establish the non-inferiority of doxyPrEP versus doxyPEP in preventing incident bacterial STIs (syphilis, gonorrhea, and/or chlamydia). Secondary objectives include evaluating the frequency of bacterial STIs, treatment adherence, tolerability, safety, changes in sexual behaviour, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles among participants. This study is the first clinical trial to directly compare doxyPrEP and doxyPEP, addressing the gaps in current evidence. The results will provide critical insights into the efficacy, safety, and AMR implications of these interventions and inform best practices for STI prevention among high-risk populations. The findings have the potential to identify the optimal strategy for reducing the burden of bacterial STIs while minimizing the risks of AMR and associated complications. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04762134. Registered 02 February 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04762134 .

Trials
Alberta Health Services (CA), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (TH), St. Paul's Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Nova Scotia Health Authority (CA), BC Centre for Disease Control (CA), Center for Global Health (US), AIDS Vancouver (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), Unity Health Toronto, University of Manitoba (CA), HIV Legal Network (CA), McGill University (CA), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.