Offline and offline-to-online reinforcement learning for bus holding control

Abstract Bus bunching is a self-reinforcing phenomenon in which a delayed bus boards more passengers, incurs further delay, and is caught by its follower. Holding a bus at a stop to regulate headways is a widely studied corrective measure, yet most evaluations rely on a single shaped objective rather than independent passenger and service outcomes. This study asks whether a fixed operational log can support network-wide holding policies without simulator interaction, and whether offline-to-online fine-tuning yields sufficient improvement to justify its computational cost. We constructed a microscopic Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) benchmark with 12 Changsha bus lines and 3.37 million logged holding-only transitions. We compared five transportation rules and three offline learners: behavior cloning (BC), conservative Q-learning (CQL), and robust ensemble Soft Actor-Critic (RE-SAC). We also compared online Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) with warm-start reinforcement learning (WSRL) and reinforcement learning with prior data (RLPD), two offline-to-online methods, under separate interaction budgets. Every reported checkpoint was evaluated across ten common 18 000-s SUMO episodes that ran to natural completion. WSRL achieved the highest selected-checkpoint return (−710 544 ± 17 162). The mean passenger waiting time was 301 ± 4 s and the mean total travel time was 1 266 ± 18 s. However, no single controller was best on every passenger and service outcome, underscoring the need for evaluation beyond shaped return. The study contributes a reproducible benchmark and a comparison design with explicitly separated interaction budgets. The findings are limited to the simulated setting, as observed operating trajectories were unavailable for external calibration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Safety and Environment
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tse/tdag059
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Offline and offline-to-online reinforcement learning for bus holding control

Yifan Zhang, Qifan Zhang, Liang Zheng, Haoming Li
Transportation Safety and Environment
Transportation Planning and Optimization
article

Offline and offline-to-online reinforcement learning for bus holding control

Yifan Zhang, Qifan Zhang, Liang Zheng, Haoming Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Bus bunching is a self-reinforcing phenomenon in which a delayed bus boards more passengers, incurs further delay, and is caught by its follower. Holding a bus at a stop to regulate headways is a widely studied corrective measure, yet most evaluations rely on a single shaped objective rather than independent passenger and service outcomes. This study asks whether a fixed operational log can support network-wide holding policies without simulator interaction, and whether offline-to-online fine-tuning yields sufficient improvement to justify its computational cost. We constructed a microscopic Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) benchmark with 12 Changsha bus lines and 3.37 million logged holding-only transitions. We compared five transportation rules and three offline learners: behavior cloning (BC), conservative Q-learning (CQL), and robust ensemble Soft Actor-Critic (RE-SAC). We also compared online Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) with warm-start reinforcement learning (WSRL) and reinforcement learning with prior data (RLPD), two offline-to-online methods, under separate interaction budgets. Every reported checkpoint was evaluated across ten common 18 000-s SUMO episodes that ran to natural completion. WSRL achieved the highest selected-checkpoint return (−710 544 ± 17 162). The mean passenger waiting time was 301 ± 4 s and the mean total travel time was 1 266 ± 18 s. However, no single controller was best on every passenger and service outcome, underscoring the need for evaluation beyond shaped return. The study contributes a reproducible benchmark and a comparison design with explicitly separated interaction budgets. The findings are limited to the simulated setting, as observed operating trajectories were unavailable for external calibration.

Transportation Safety and Environment
Monash University Malaysia (MY), Central South University (CN), Shanghai Ocean University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.