Multimodal Imaging of Choroidal Tumors: What Ultrasonography Still Uniquely Provides

Choroidal tumors encompass a heterogeneous group of lesions ranging from benign melanocytic nevi and vascular tumors to malignant melanomas and metastatic lesions. Their evaluation increasingly relies on multimodal imaging combining techniques that interrogate different physical and biological properties of the lesion and surrounding tissues. This narrative review examines the principles, clinical contributions, and limitations of optical and acoustic imaging in the assessment of choroidal tumors. Modern optical modalities—including spectral-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCT-A), fundus autofluorescence, ultra-widefield imaging, and scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO)-based techniques—provide high-resolution information on lesion morphology where optically accessible, as well as on associated retinal pigment epithelium alterations, subretinal fluid, photoreceptor changes, fluorophore-related signals, and vascular flow or permeability. However, many of these findings reflect responses of the retina, RPE, or choroidal vasculature adjacent to the tumor rather than intrinsic tumor characteristics. Ultrasonography provides different information based on acoustic backscatter and attenuation, including lesion dimensions, internal reflectivity and echo patterns, and remains particularly important for larger or peripheral lesions and when optical visualization is limited by media opacity. Its interpretation and measurement are nevertheless operator- and scan-dependent, with limitations related to spatial resolution, insonation geometry, boundary definition, and reproducibility, particularly for small lesions. Representative examples of choroidal nevi, melanomas, circumscribed choroidal hemangiomas, metastases, and selected pseudotumoral lesions illustrate how multimodal findings contribute to differential diagnosis, longitudinal assessment, and clinical decision-making. Emerging techniques such as OCT-A and Retro mode imaging provide additional structural or flow-related information, although their tumor-specific diagnostic performance remains incompletely validated. Multimodal imaging can substantially narrow the differential diagnosis but cannot always establish tissue diagnosis, and biopsy or systemic investigation may remain necessary in selected cases. Accurate evaluation of choroidal tumors therefore depends on integrating the distinct information and limitations of each modality with clinical findings and longitudinal evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical & Translational Ophthalmology
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcto4030023
Primary Topic
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multimodal Imaging of Choroidal Tumors: What Ultrasonography Still Uniquely Provides

Thomas Desmettre, Livia Lumbroso-Le Rouic
Journal of Clinical & Translational Ophthalmology
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
article

Multimodal Imaging of Choroidal Tumors: What Ultrasonography Still Uniquely Provides

Thomas Desmettre, Livia Lumbroso-Le Rouic
article en

Abstract

Choroidal tumors encompass a heterogeneous group of lesions ranging from benign melanocytic nevi and vascular tumors to malignant melanomas and metastatic lesions. Their evaluation increasingly relies on multimodal imaging combining techniques that interrogate different physical and biological properties of the lesion and surrounding tissues. This narrative review examines the principles, clinical contributions, and limitations of optical and acoustic imaging in the assessment of choroidal tumors. Modern optical modalities—including spectral-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCT-A), fundus autofluorescence, ultra-widefield imaging, and scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO)-based techniques—provide high-resolution information on lesion morphology where optically accessible, as well as on associated retinal pigment epithelium alterations, subretinal fluid, photoreceptor changes, fluorophore-related signals, and vascular flow or permeability. However, many of these findings reflect responses of the retina, RPE, or choroidal vasculature adjacent to the tumor rather than intrinsic tumor characteristics. Ultrasonography provides different information based on acoustic backscatter and attenuation, including lesion dimensions, internal reflectivity and echo patterns, and remains particularly important for larger or peripheral lesions and when optical visualization is limited by media opacity. Its interpretation and measurement are nevertheless operator- and scan-dependent, with limitations related to spatial resolution, insonation geometry, boundary definition, and reproducibility, particularly for small lesions. Representative examples of choroidal nevi, melanomas, circumscribed choroidal hemangiomas, metastases, and selected pseudotumoral lesions illustrate how multimodal findings contribute to differential diagnosis, longitudinal assessment, and clinical decision-making. Emerging techniques such as OCT-A and Retro mode imaging provide additional structural or flow-related information, although their tumor-specific diagnostic performance remains incompletely validated. Multimodal imaging can substantially narrow the differential diagnosis but cannot always establish tissue diagnosis, and biopsy or systemic investigation may remain necessary in selected cases. Accurate evaluation of choroidal tumors therefore depends on integrating the distinct information and limitations of each modality with clinical findings and longitudinal evolution.

Journal of Clinical & Translational OphthalmologyVol. 4(3)
University of Kansas (US), The University of Kansas Health System (US), Technologie Médicale (France) (FR), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Institut Curie (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.