Prognostic value of OCT biomarkers and systemic factors for early and long term anatomical treatment response in diabetic macular edema

Abstract Background To evaluate the prognostic value of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers and systemic factors for early and long-term anatomical response to anti-VEGF therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods This retrospective study included 164 eyes from 105 patients with type 2 diabetes and DME who received three monthly loading doses of intravitreal bevacizumab (January 2013 to April 2024) and were subsequently managed with a pro re nata (PRN) regimen using standard retreatment criteria. Completion of the loading phase (minimum follow-up, 3 months) was required for inclusion. Anatomical response was assessed after the loading phase (early response) and at final follow-up (long-term response); eyes were classified as full, partial, or non-responders based on CMT and OCT morphology. Baseline demographic, systemic, and OCT characteristics were analyzed using generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression to account for inter-eye correlation, followed by one-eye-per-patient sensitivity analyses. Results After loading, 10 eyes (6.1%) were full responders, 72 (43.9%) partial responders, and 82 (50.0%) non-responders; 90% of early full responders maintained full response at final follow-up. In multivariable GEE analyses, higher baseline CMT, higher hyperreflective foci (HRF) count, and hyperreflective intraretinal material were independently associated with early anatomical response under the original percentage-reduction outcome definition; for long-term response, baseline CMT was only nominally associated and did not survive correction for multiple testing, and DRIL, EZ/ELM defect, and intraretinal cyst size were not significant. Both models showed moderate discrimination after bootstrap optimism correction (AUC 0.751 and 0.757, respectively). Sensitivity analyses across eye-selection strategies were consistent for baseline CMT, DRIL, EZ/ELM defect, and hyperreflective material, but intraretinal cyst size was unstable; all associations were sensitive to how anatomical response was defined. Conclusions Baseline OCT biomarkers showed candidate associations with anatomical response, but several, including the hyperreflective-material association, were not reproduced when the outcome was redefined using continuous final CMT or an absolute CMT threshold, despite robustness within the primary model. Discrimination was moderate (optimism-corrected AUC 0.75–0.76). These findings identify candidate prognostic OCT biomarkers requiring external validation before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-05350-2
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Prognostic value of OCT biomarkers and systemic factors for early and long term anatomical treatment response in diabetic macular edema

Zafer Cebeci, Gürkan Erdoğan, Tugce Ozdemir
BMC Ophthalmology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Prognostic value of OCT biomarkers and systemic factors for early and long term anatomical treatment response in diabetic macular edema

Zafer Cebeci, Gürkan Erdoğan, Tugce Ozdemir
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To evaluate the prognostic value of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers and systemic factors for early and long-term anatomical response to anti-VEGF therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods This retrospective study included 164 eyes from 105 patients with type 2 diabetes and DME who received three monthly loading doses of intravitreal bevacizumab (January 2013 to April 2024) and were subsequently managed with a pro re nata (PRN) regimen using standard retreatment criteria. Completion of the loading phase (minimum follow-up, 3 months) was required for inclusion. Anatomical response was assessed after the loading phase (early response) and at final follow-up (long-term response); eyes were classified as full, partial, or non-responders based on CMT and OCT morphology. Baseline demographic, systemic, and OCT characteristics were analyzed using generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression to account for inter-eye correlation, followed by one-eye-per-patient sensitivity analyses. Results After loading, 10 eyes (6.1%) were full responders, 72 (43.9%) partial responders, and 82 (50.0%) non-responders; 90% of early full responders maintained full response at final follow-up. In multivariable GEE analyses, higher baseline CMT, higher hyperreflective foci (HRF) count, and hyperreflective intraretinal material were independently associated with early anatomical response under the original percentage-reduction outcome definition; for long-term response, baseline CMT was only nominally associated and did not survive correction for multiple testing, and DRIL, EZ/ELM defect, and intraretinal cyst size were not significant. Both models showed moderate discrimination after bootstrap optimism correction (AUC 0.751 and 0.757, respectively). Sensitivity analyses across eye-selection strategies were consistent for baseline CMT, DRIL, EZ/ELM defect, and hyperreflective material, but intraretinal cyst size was unstable; all associations were sensitive to how anatomical response was defined. Conclusions Baseline OCT biomarkers showed candidate associations with anatomical response, but several, including the hyperreflective-material association, were not reproduced when the outcome was redefined using continuous final CMT or an absolute CMT threshold, despite robustness within the primary model. Discrimination was moderate (optimism-corrected AUC 0.75–0.76). These findings identify candidate prognostic OCT biomarkers requiring external validation before clinical application.

BMC Ophthalmology
Neighborhood House (US), Istanbul University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.