Recycling biowaste with mechanical biological treatment technologies: The rise and fall of a socio-technical imaginary

In France, the development of fermentable waste recovery sectors has been shaped by the emergence of so-called “mechanical-biological treatment” facilities – more commonly known as “MBT” plants – throughout the 2000s and 2010s. Promoted by major actors in the waste-management industry, these plants offered a turnkey technological solution capable of sorting and treating fermentable waste while converting it into compost. For local authorities, MBT plants represented a convenient technological fix that eliminated the need to mobilize citizens to adopt source-separation practices. However, this rapid expansion came to a halt in 2015 following the adoption of the Energy Transition for Green Growth Act (LTECV), which, in its Article 70, mandates “the widespread implementation of source separation of bio-waste.” This regulatory shift marked the culmination of a long-standing socio-technical dispute that had set advocates of MBT facilities against detractors for nearly two decades. Beneath this controversy lies a struggle for control over the “socio-technical imaginary” of biowaste recovery. In this paper, I show how the sociotechnical imaginaries associated with these recovery methods were shaped by waste-management stakeholders – specifically, how the imaginary of MBT plants gained traction in the 1990s and early 2000s, only to be subsequently discredited in the years that followed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104430
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Recycling biowaste with mechanical biological treatment technologies: The rise and fall of a socio-technical imaginary

François‐Joseph Daniel
Environmental Science & Policy
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Recycling biowaste with mechanical biological treatment technologies: The rise and fall of a socio-technical imaginary

François‐Joseph Daniel
article en

Abstract

In France, the development of fermentable waste recovery sectors has been shaped by the emergence of so-called “mechanical-biological treatment” facilities – more commonly known as “MBT” plants – throughout the 2000s and 2010s. Promoted by major actors in the waste-management industry, these plants offered a turnkey technological solution capable of sorting and treating fermentable waste while converting it into compost. For local authorities, MBT plants represented a convenient technological fix that eliminated the need to mobilize citizens to adopt source-separation practices. However, this rapid expansion came to a halt in 2015 following the adoption of the Energy Transition for Green Growth Act (LTECV), which, in its Article 70, mandates “the widespread implementation of source separation of bio-waste.” This regulatory shift marked the culmination of a long-standing socio-technical dispute that had set advocates of MBT facilities against detractors for nearly two decades. Beneath this controversy lies a struggle for control over the “socio-technical imaginary” of biowaste recovery. In this paper, I show how the sociotechnical imaginaries associated with these recovery methods were shaped by waste-management stakeholders – specifically, how the imaginary of MBT plants gained traction in the 1990s and early 2000s, only to be subsequently discredited in the years that followed.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 184
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recycling biowaste with mechanical biological treatment technologies: The rise and fall of a socio-technical imaginary — François‐Joseph Daniel · Environmental Science & Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS