AI without borders: reflexive thematic analysis of artificial intelligence justice in global health

Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely expected to mitigate global health inequities. However, current research mainly focuses on downstream issues such as algorithmic bias and data limitations and neglects upstream power structures and historical structural root causes. This study examines how AI deployment in global health may reproduce and reinforce structural inequities. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted base on systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to April 2026. The search strategies combined three conceptual domains: “AI”, “global health” and “justice”. Supplementary searches were performed through reference list screening, with final inclusion determined by relevance to the research theme. After screening a total of 554 records, 37 studies were ultimately included in the qualitative analysis. A comprehensive justice framework was constructed to identify how AI-related justice dilemmas emerged across global health systems, with the Global South and resource-limited contexts serving as critical sites where global power asymmetries became especially visible. The findings reveal that justice is not limited to the distribution of resources but also encompasses multiple dimensions, including procedural, historical and structural, epistemic, and reparative justice. AI justice reflects global power relations; effective equity transformation requires examining and reconstructing power structures in which AI is embedded. Whether AI ultimately bridges or widens global health inequities depends not on algorithmic sophistication but on the willingness to redistribute the power that shapes its design, deployment, and governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01616-y
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

AI without borders: reflexive thematic analysis of artificial intelligence justice in global health

Mingtao Huang, Lanyi Yu, Hongliang Sun, Yue Shi
BMC Medical Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI without borders: reflexive thematic analysis of artificial intelligence justice in global health

Mingtao Huang, Lanyi Yu, Hongliang Sun, Yue Shi
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely expected to mitigate global health inequities. However, current research mainly focuses on downstream issues such as algorithmic bias and data limitations and neglects upstream power structures and historical structural root causes. This study examines how AI deployment in global health may reproduce and reinforce structural inequities. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted base on systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to April 2026. The search strategies combined three conceptual domains: “AI”, “global health” and “justice”. Supplementary searches were performed through reference list screening, with final inclusion determined by relevance to the research theme. After screening a total of 554 records, 37 studies were ultimately included in the qualitative analysis. A comprehensive justice framework was constructed to identify how AI-related justice dilemmas emerged across global health systems, with the Global South and resource-limited contexts serving as critical sites where global power asymmetries became especially visible. The findings reveal that justice is not limited to the distribution of resources but also encompasses multiple dimensions, including procedural, historical and structural, epistemic, and reparative justice. AI justice reflects global power relations; effective equity transformation requires examining and reconstructing power structures in which AI is embedded. Whether AI ultimately bridges or widens global health inequities depends not on algorithmic sophistication but on the willingness to redistribute the power that shapes its design, deployment, and governance.

BMC Medical Ethics
Fujian Medical University (CN), Dalian Medical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Dalian Medical University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.