Full-Flowfield Inversion of Debris-Flow Dynamics: A Global–Local Optimization Framework for Model Parameter Estimation from Final Accumulation Fields

Calibration of debris-flow models is important for reproducible hazard mapping, transparent scenario analysis, and risk-informed territorial planning. Reliable calibration of debris-flow models is limited by parameter uncertainty, non-uniqueness, and the loss of spatial information when observations are reduced to scalar targets. This study presents a global–local full-flowfield inversion framework for estimating effective Voellmy friction parameters from complete final-thickness rasters, thereby replacing subjective trial-and-error adjustment with an explicit forward–inverse workflow and a spatially distributed objective function. A two-dimensional finite-volume shallow-flow solver is coupled with a genetic algorithm for bounded global exploration and projected finite-difference gradient descent for local refinement. The composite objective combines thickness, wet footprint, signed boundary distance, and total volume mismatches. The framework was evaluated through controlled parameter recovery, objective profiling, ten-seed repeatability tests, observation perturbations, conditional identifiability analysis, and a controlled Morino–Rendinara back-analysis retrieval test based on a published real-event parameterization and the real terrain. Uniform reference coefficients of 0.10, 0.25, and 0.45 were recovered with a mean absolute error of 1.90×10−4 and exact wet footprint agreement. Across ten baseline inversions, the standard deviation of the estimate was 1.53×10−4. Random removal of up to 50% of observation cells had negligible influence, whereas thickness noise and systematic scaling produced larger deviations; at 20% noise, mean IoU remained 0.9861. Prescribing ξ between 250 and 1000 m s−2 shifted the estimated μ from 0.243038 to 0.254628 despite nearly identical final deposits, demonstrating conditional identifiability. In the two-zone experiment, the framework recovered μup=0.009991 and μdown=0.100184, with a held-out RMSE of 4.49×10−5 m and IoU equal to one. Full-flowfield inversion therefore provides accurate and reproducible event-specific parameter retrieval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16090378
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Full-Flowfield Inversion of Debris-Flow Dynamics: A Global–Local Optimization Framework for Model Parameter Estimation from Final Accumulation Fields

Massimo Mangifesta, Nicola Sciarra, Mauricio Secchi
Geosciences
Landslides and related hazards
article

Full-Flowfield Inversion of Debris-Flow Dynamics: A Global–Local Optimization Framework for Model Parameter Estimation from Final Accumulation Fields

Massimo Mangifesta, Nicola Sciarra, Mauricio Secchi
article en

Abstract

Calibration of debris-flow models is important for reproducible hazard mapping, transparent scenario analysis, and risk-informed territorial planning. Reliable calibration of debris-flow models is limited by parameter uncertainty, non-uniqueness, and the loss of spatial information when observations are reduced to scalar targets. This study presents a global–local full-flowfield inversion framework for estimating effective Voellmy friction parameters from complete final-thickness rasters, thereby replacing subjective trial-and-error adjustment with an explicit forward–inverse workflow and a spatially distributed objective function. A two-dimensional finite-volume shallow-flow solver is coupled with a genetic algorithm for bounded global exploration and projected finite-difference gradient descent for local refinement. The composite objective combines thickness, wet footprint, signed boundary distance, and total volume mismatches. The framework was evaluated through controlled parameter recovery, objective profiling, ten-seed repeatability tests, observation perturbations, conditional identifiability analysis, and a controlled Morino–Rendinara back-analysis retrieval test based on a published real-event parameterization and the real terrain. Uniform reference coefficients of 0.10, 0.25, and 0.45 were recovered with a mean absolute error of 1.90×10−4 and exact wet footprint agreement. Across ten baseline inversions, the standard deviation of the estimate was 1.53×10−4. Random removal of up to 50% of observation cells had negligible influence, whereas thickness noise and systematic scaling produced larger deviations; at 20% noise, mean IoU remained 0.9861. Prescribing ξ between 250 and 1000 m s−2 shifted the estimated μ from 0.243038 to 0.254628 despite nearly identical final deposits, demonstrating conditional identifiability. In the two-zone experiment, the framework recovered μup=0.009991 and μdown=0.100184, with a held-out RMSE of 4.49×10−5 m and IoU equal to one. Full-flowfield inversion therefore provides accurate and reproducible event-specific parameter retrieval.

GeosciencesVol. 16(9)
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.