A sustainability and digitalization maturity model for supply chains: bridging Industry 5.0, operational excellence and the SDGs

Purpose Existing sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) maturity models remain fragmented and predominantly diagnostic, offering limited guidance for prioritizing improvements across interdependent sustainability dimensions. This study aims to develop an integrated diagnostic–prescriptive maturity model to support the sustainable and digital path (twin transition) in supply chains by combining sustainability assessment, Industry 5.0-oriented human-centric digitalization, operational excellence and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The model is particularly relevant to Ibero-American supply chains operating under resource constraints, institutional heterogeneity and increasing pressure to align digital transformation with sustainability priorities. Design/methodology/approach Following design science research, a systematic literature review identified 26 maturity models, which were examined through qualitative content analysis to reveal structural gaps and derive the artifact’s design requirements. The model integrates 187 variables across 4 dimensions and 13 subdimensions. It was refined and validated through a two-round Fuzzy Delphi process involving 15 experts from five Ibero-American countries. A group-based ordinal multicriteria method was embedded to aggregate stakeholders’ linguistic judgments into a consensus ranking of improvement priorities. An illustrative application demonstrated its use. Findings The model assesses environmental, social, economic and transversal maturity while translating identified gaps into ranked improvement priorities and a strategic roadmap. Digital technologies, including the Internet of Things, cyber-physical systems and big data analytics, are framed as sociotechnical enablers of transparency, traceability and responsiveness. The model therefore supports the assessment of Industry 5.0, Operational Excellence 5.0 and SDG-oriented improvement efforts. Originality/value This study combines sustainability assessment, human-centric digitalization and multicriteria prioritization within a single maturity artifact. By moving beyond diagnosis toward collective, context-sensitive prioritization, it provides decision support for the twin transition, while large-scale applications remain necessary to confirm usability and performance benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-08-2026-0421
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A sustainability and digitalization maturity model for supply chains: bridging Industry 5.0, operational excellence and the SDGs

Rodrigo Goyannes Gusm�ão Caiado, Davidson de Almeida Santos, CARLOS ALEJANDRO DÍAZ SCHERY
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

A sustainability and digitalization maturity model for supply chains: bridging Industry 5.0, operational excellence and the SDGs

Rodrigo Goyannes Gusm�ão Caiado, Davidson de Almeida Santos, CARLOS ALEJANDRO DÍAZ SCHERY
article en

Abstract

Purpose Existing sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) maturity models remain fragmented and predominantly diagnostic, offering limited guidance for prioritizing improvements across interdependent sustainability dimensions. This study aims to develop an integrated diagnostic–prescriptive maturity model to support the sustainable and digital path (twin transition) in supply chains by combining sustainability assessment, Industry 5.0-oriented human-centric digitalization, operational excellence and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The model is particularly relevant to Ibero-American supply chains operating under resource constraints, institutional heterogeneity and increasing pressure to align digital transformation with sustainability priorities. Design/methodology/approach Following design science research, a systematic literature review identified 26 maturity models, which were examined through qualitative content analysis to reveal structural gaps and derive the artifact’s design requirements. The model integrates 187 variables across 4 dimensions and 13 subdimensions. It was refined and validated through a two-round Fuzzy Delphi process involving 15 experts from five Ibero-American countries. A group-based ordinal multicriteria method was embedded to aggregate stakeholders’ linguistic judgments into a consensus ranking of improvement priorities. An illustrative application demonstrated its use. Findings The model assesses environmental, social, economic and transversal maturity while translating identified gaps into ranked improvement priorities and a strategic roadmap. Digital technologies, including the Internet of Things, cyber-physical systems and big data analytics, are framed as sociotechnical enablers of transparency, traceability and responsiveness. The model therefore supports the assessment of Industry 5.0, Operational Excellence 5.0 and SDG-oriented improvement efforts. Originality/value This study combines sustainability assessment, human-centric digitalization and multicriteria prioritization within a single maturity artifact. By moving beyond diagnosis toward collective, context-sensitive prioritization, it provides decision support for the twin transition, while large-scale applications remain necessary to confirm usability and performance benefits.

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.