Scaffolding agency in cultural policy: a capabilities framework for evaluating cultural interventions

Abstract The role of culture in promoting social and behavioral change has gained increasing attention in cultural policy, yet mechanisms of intervention, which we situate on a spectrum ranging from nudges to cultural interventions, remain insufficiently conceptualized. This lack of clarity obscures how different interventions relate to one another and complicates their evaluation, contributing to the well-known limitations of “toolkit” approaches. This paper develops a unifying framework that understands interventions as ways of scaffolding agency across multiple dimensions. Drawing on the capabilities approach, philosophy, and situated cognition, we argue that nudges and cultural interventions are best conceived as points on a spectrum defined by the degree of agency they afford. This perspective provides principled criteria for both intervention design and impact assessment, offering an alternative to reductive evaluation models while accommodating the complexity of cultural engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08440-0
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Scaffolding agency in cultural policy: a capabilities framework for evaluating cultural interventions

Pier Luigi Sacco, Alfredo Vernazzani, Giulia Candeloro
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Scaffolding agency in cultural policy: a capabilities framework for evaluating cultural interventions

Pier Luigi Sacco, Alfredo Vernazzani, Giulia Candeloro
article en

Abstract

Abstract The role of culture in promoting social and behavioral change has gained increasing attention in cultural policy, yet mechanisms of intervention, which we situate on a spectrum ranging from nudges to cultural interventions, remain insufficiently conceptualized. This lack of clarity obscures how different interventions relate to one another and complicates their evaluation, contributing to the well-known limitations of “toolkit” approaches. This paper develops a unifying framework that understands interventions as ways of scaffolding agency across multiple dimensions. Drawing on the capabilities approach, philosophy, and situated cognition, we argue that nudges and cultural interventions are best conceived as points on a spectrum defined by the degree of agency they afford. This perspective provides principled criteria for both intervention design and impact assessment, offering an alternative to reductive evaluation models while accommodating the complexity of cultural engagement.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Harvard University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), TU Dortmund University (DE), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.