The role of MEG cluster characteristics in defining the epileptogenic zone: A retrospective study of 101 seizure‐free patients

{"OBJECTIVE:":[0],"Magnetoencephalography":[1],"(MEG)":[2],"is":[3],"used":[4,135],"widely":[5],"in":[6,22,127,173,250,292,306],"presurgical":[7,272],"evaluation":[8,273],"of":[9,20,123,267,295],"medically":[10],"intractable":[11],"epilepsy.":[12],"Prior":[13],"research":[14],"has":[15],"documented":[16],"the":[17,119,128],"added":[18],"value":[19,305],"MEG":[21,29,57,88,268],"refining":[23],"surgical":[24,287],"strategies;":[25],"however,":[26],"not":[27,256],"all":[28],"clusters":[30,62,184,200,211,218,238,291],"require":[31],"resection":[32],"for":[33,49,279],"seizure":[34,251],"freedom,":[35],"suggesting":[36],"that":[37],"they":[38],"represent":[39],"nodes":[40],"within":[41],"a":[42,93,151],"broader":[43],"epileptic":[44],"network,":[45],"with":[46,72,92,118,148,198,240],"differing":[47],"importance":[48],"epileptogenic":[50],"zone":[51],"(EZ)":[52],"localization.":[53],"We":[54,68],"examined":[55],"whether":[56],"cluster":[58,162,269],"characteristics":[59,270],"can":[60],"identify":[61],"most":[63],"relevant":[64],"to":[65,136,185,204,274],"EZ.":[66],"METHODS:":[67],"studied":[69],"101":[70],"patients":[71,197],"focal":[73],"epilepsy":[74,157],"who":[75],"underwent":[76],"intracranial":[77],"electroencephalography":[78],"(ICEEG),":[79],"resective":[80],"surgery,":[81,160],"and":[82,96,112,114,143,161,175,191,231,246,298],"became":[83],"seizure-free":[84],"at":[85],"1":[86],"year.":[87],"recordings":[89],"were":[90,106,125,166,179,201,212,248],"obtained":[91],"306-channel":[94],"system":[95],"analyzed":[97],"using":[98],"single":[99],"equivalent":[100],"current":[101],"dipole":[102],"(SECD)":[103],"modeling.":[104],"Clusters":[105,172,195],"categorized":[107],"by":[108,258],"anatomic":[109],"location,":[110],"tightness,":[111],"orientation":[113],"defined":[115],"as":[116,150],"\\"matched\\"":[117],"EZ":[120,276],"if":[121],"≥70%":[122],"dipoles":[124],"included":[126],"resection.":[129],"A":[130],"sublobar":[131],"anatomo-functional":[132],"scheme":[133],"was":[134],"map":[137],"cluster-resection":[138],"spatial":[139],"relationships.":[140],"Logistic":[141],"regression":[142],"generalized":[144],"linear":[145],"mixed":[146],"models":[147],"patient":[149],"random":[152],"effect":[153],"evaluated":[154],"age,":[155],"sex,":[156],"duration,":[158],"prior":[159],"characteristics.":[163],"Match":[164,253],"rates":[165,254],"compared":[167],"across":[168],"pathology":[169,300],"groups.":[170],"RESULTS:":[171],"frontal":[174],"interlobar":[176],"junctional":[177],"regions":[178],"less":[180,202],"likely":[181,203,214],"than":[182,216],"temporal":[183,230],"be":[186,205],"matched":[187,206,215],"(p":[188,207,219],"=":[189,193,220],".003":[190],"p":[192],".005).":[194],"from":[196],"multiple":[199],"<":[208],".001).":[209],"Tight":[210],"more":[213],"loose":[217],".013).":[221],"Cluster-resection":[222,282],"mapping":[223,283],"identified":[224],"distinct":[225],"propagation":[226],"patterns,":[227],"including":[228],"anterior-posterior":[229],"ipsilateral-contralateral":[232],"opercular":[233],"spread.":[234],"Among":[235],"49":[236],"mismatched":[237],"sampled":[239],"ICEEG,":[241],"91%":[242],"showed":[243],"interictal":[244],"discharges":[245],"63%":[247],"involved":[249],"propagation.":[252],"did":[255],"differ":[257],"pathology.":[259],"SIGNIFICANCE:":[260],"Our":[261],"findings":[262],"support":[263],"incorporating":[264],"detailed":[265],"analysis":[266],"into":[271],"refine":[275],"localization,":[277],"especially":[278],"invasive":[280],"evaluation.":[281],"patterns":[284],"may":[285],"assist":[286],"hypothesis":[288],"generation.":[289],"Matched":[290],"mild":[293],"malformation":[294],"cortical":[296],"development":[297],"negative":[299],"cases":[301],"further":[302],"highlight":[303],"MEG's":[304],"challenging":[307],"pathological":[308],"substrates.":[309]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epilepsia
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epi.70499
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The role of MEG cluster characteristics in defining the epileptogenic zone: A retrospective study of 101 seizure‐free patients

Balu Krishnan, Andreas V. Alexopoulos, Irène Wang, Ryuzaburo Kochi et al.
Epilepsia
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

The role of MEG cluster characteristics in defining the epileptogenic zone: A retrospective study of 101 seizure‐free patients

Balu Krishnan, Andreas V. Alexopoulos, Irène Wang, Ryuzaburo Kochi, Spencer Morris, Ingmar Blümcke, Imad Najm, Demitre Serletis, Richard C. Burgess, Juan Bulacio, William Bingaman, Hiroatsu Murakami, Lisa Ferguson
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is used widely in presurgical evaluation of medically intractable epilepsy. Prior research has documented the added value of MEG in refining surgical strategies; however, not all MEG clusters require resection for seizure freedom, suggesting that they represent nodes within a broader epileptic network, with differing importance for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localization. We examined whether MEG cluster characteristics can identify clusters most relevant to EZ. METHODS: We studied 101 patients with focal epilepsy who underwent intracranial electroencephalography (ICEEG), resective surgery, and became seizure-free at 1 year. MEG recordings were obtained with a 306-channel system and analyzed using single equivalent current dipole (SECD) modeling. Clusters were categorized by anatomic location, tightness, and orientation and defined as "matched" with the EZ if ≥70% of dipoles were included in the resection. A sublobar anatomo-functional scheme was used to map cluster-resection spatial relationships. Logistic regression and generalized linear mixed models with patient as a random effect evaluated age, sex, epilepsy duration, prior surgery, and cluster characteristics. Match rates were compared across pathology groups. RESULTS: Clusters in frontal and interlobar junctional regions were less likely than temporal clusters to be matched (p = .003 and p = .005). Clusters from patients with multiple clusters were less likely to be matched (p < .001). Tight clusters were more likely matched than loose clusters (p = .013). Cluster-resection mapping identified distinct propagation patterns, including anterior-posterior temporal and ipsilateral-contralateral opercular spread. Among 49 mismatched clusters sampled with ICEEG, 91% showed interictal discharges and 63% were involved in seizure propagation. Match rates did not differ by pathology. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings support incorporating detailed analysis of MEG cluster characteristics into presurgical evaluation to refine EZ localization, especially for invasive evaluation. Cluster-resection mapping patterns may assist surgical hypothesis generation. Matched clusters in mild malformation of cortical development and negative pathology cases further highlight MEG's value in challenging pathological substrates.

Epilepsia
Cleveland Clinic (US), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), The Neurological Institute (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.