Mansplaining and the marginalisation of women academics in Turkey

This study investigates the systematic marginalisation of women academics in Turkish universities through the lens of ‘mansplaining’, using a phenomenological design and interviews with 13 women academics, and situates these dynamics within a centralised, politicised higher education system that shapes women's epistemic authority. Mansplaining emerges not as a communicative annoyance but as institutional violence and epistemic silencing that enforces a ‘masculinised’ identity performance and reinforces vertical discrimination—symbolised by the ‘men are deans, women are assistants’ hierarchy—particularly in regional settings. Participants' selective reticence about the political context reflects institutional caution and self-censorship. The study proposes concrete interventions—defining ‘epistemic violence’ in university codes, ‘interruption audits’ in academic boards, and peer-solidarity networks—underscoring the need for systemic transformation toward a more equitable academic culture in Turkey.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women s Studies International Forum
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2026.103436
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mansplaining and the marginalisation of women academics in Turkey

K. Begüm DOĞRUYOL ALADAK, Rozerin Yasa
Women s Studies International Forum
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Mansplaining and the marginalisation of women academics in Turkey

K. Begüm DOĞRUYOL ALADAK, Rozerin Yasa
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the systematic marginalisation of women academics in Turkish universities through the lens of ‘mansplaining’, using a phenomenological design and interviews with 13 women academics, and situates these dynamics within a centralised, politicised higher education system that shapes women's epistemic authority. Mansplaining emerges not as a communicative annoyance but as institutional violence and epistemic silencing that enforces a ‘masculinised’ identity performance and reinforces vertical discrimination—symbolised by the ‘men are deans, women are assistants’ hierarchy—particularly in regional settings. Participants' selective reticence about the political context reflects institutional caution and self-censorship. The study proposes concrete interventions—defining ‘epistemic violence’ in university codes, ‘interruption audits’ in academic boards, and peer-solidarity networks—underscoring the need for systemic transformation toward a more equitable academic culture in Turkey.

Women s Studies International ForumVol. 120
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi (TR), University of Manchester (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.