Media rituals and cultural authorization: Negotiating representational legitimacy in the Super Bowl halftime show

National media rituals are key sites where cultural representation and legitimacy are publicly negotiated. This article uses cultural authorization to explain how institutions, media discourse, and mediated representations of audience and community reception define who can legitimately represent the nation within these events. Drawing on symbolic boundary theory and media ritual scholarship, the study analyzes coverage of Bad Bunny’s selection as the Super Bowl LX Halftime Show headliner. Using qualitative media discourse analysis (October 2025 to February 2026), the article identifies four recurring dynamics: institutional authorization through market legitimacy, boundary contestation through authenticity claims, counter-ritual formation, and community recognition. These dynamics show how media rituals transform programming decisions into struggles over national representation. The article contributes by specifying cultural authorization as a mechanism through which symbolic boundaries become publicly consequential in mass-mediated events. It argues that media rituals function as authorization infrastructures where market logics, political discourse, and mediated reception claims shape the terms of legitimate representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media Culture & Society
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437261488239
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Media rituals and cultural authorization: Negotiating representational legitimacy in the Super Bowl halftime show

Terry Mills
Media Culture & Society
Media Studies and Communication
article

Media rituals and cultural authorization: Negotiating representational legitimacy in the Super Bowl halftime show

Terry Mills
article en

Abstract

National media rituals are key sites where cultural representation and legitimacy are publicly negotiated. This article uses cultural authorization to explain how institutions, media discourse, and mediated representations of audience and community reception define who can legitimately represent the nation within these events. Drawing on symbolic boundary theory and media ritual scholarship, the study analyzes coverage of Bad Bunny’s selection as the Super Bowl LX Halftime Show headliner. Using qualitative media discourse analysis (October 2025 to February 2026), the article identifies four recurring dynamics: institutional authorization through market legitimacy, boundary contestation through authenticity claims, counter-ritual formation, and community recognition. These dynamics show how media rituals transform programming decisions into struggles over national representation. The article contributes by specifying cultural authorization as a mechanism through which symbolic boundaries become publicly consequential in mass-mediated events. It argues that media rituals function as authorization infrastructures where market logics, political discourse, and mediated reception claims shape the terms of legitimate representation.

Media Culture & Society
Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Media rituals and cultural authorization: Negotiating representational legitimacy in the Super Bowl halftime show — Terry Mills · Media Culture & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS