Historical institutionalism and foreign policymaking in authoritarian regimes: Egypt–EU relations since the Barcelona Declaration

This article examines Egypt’s foreign policy towards the European Union since the launch of the Barcelona Process in 1995. While research on the foreign policy of Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) states has steadily expanded, most analyses either focus on the pre-Arab revolts period or use the main theories of international relations to explain foreign policy strategies. The article employs a historical institutional lens in order to offer a more nuanced understanding of the institutional factors that underpin contemporary foreign policy decisions. Contrary to the belief that in authoritarian regimes, foreign policy decisions are shaped by an unconstrained and unaccountable leadership or by external pressures, the article argues that domestic institutional constraints matter. Long-standing political structures, path dependencies, and critical junctures should also be considered as important factors of foreign policy decision-making in the Arab Mediterranean region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mediterranean Politics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2026.2733696
Primary Topic
Global Political and Social Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Historical institutionalism and foreign policymaking in authoritarian regimes: Egypt–EU relations since the Barcelona Declaration

Assem Dandashly, Christos Kourtelis
Mediterranean Politics
Global Political and Social Dynamics
article

Historical institutionalism and foreign policymaking in authoritarian regimes: Egypt–EU relations since the Barcelona Declaration

Assem Dandashly, Christos Kourtelis
article en

Abstract

This article examines Egypt’s foreign policy towards the European Union since the launch of the Barcelona Process in 1995. While research on the foreign policy of Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) states has steadily expanded, most analyses either focus on the pre-Arab revolts period or use the main theories of international relations to explain foreign policy strategies. The article employs a historical institutional lens in order to offer a more nuanced understanding of the institutional factors that underpin contemporary foreign policy decisions. Contrary to the belief that in authoritarian regimes, foreign policy decisions are shaped by an unconstrained and unaccountable leadership or by external pressures, the article argues that domestic institutional constraints matter. Long-standing political structures, path dependencies, and critical junctures should also be considered as important factors of foreign policy decision-making in the Arab Mediterranean region.

Mediterranean Politics
Maastricht University (NL), International Culture University (BD)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Political and Social Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Historical institutionalism and foreign policymaking in authoritarian regimes: Egypt–EU relations since the Barcelona Declaration — Assem Dandashly, Christos Kourtelis · Mediterranean Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS