Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Abdominal Aortic Wall: Segmental, Positional and Flow Effects

Current aortic magnetic-resonance-elastography (MRE) infers wall stiffness indirectly from waveguide effects. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of abdominal aortic MRE for direct assessment of wall stiffness and its dependence on segmental region, patient position, and hemodynamic parameters. This prospective study examined 11 healthy young male volunteers using MRE to evaluate two anatomical segments of the abdominal aorta: the supraceliac (SC) and infrarenal (IR) segments. The volunteers underwent examinations in both the supine and prone positions. An ECG trigger delay was implemented for MRE to minimize the blood signal in the lumen. Three-dimensional wavefields were acquired at three mechanical frequencies (70, 80, and 90 Hz), and shear wave speed (SWS) maps were reconstructed as a stiffness surrogate. In addition, blood flow-velocity MRI was performed assess hemodynamic parameters. Test-retest examinations were performed in a subgroup to evaluate repeatability of aortic MRE. Aortic wall MRE was successful in all participants with good repeatability (ICC = 0.76). Mean wall SWS was higher in SC than IR segments at supine (1.47 ± 0.07 vs. 1.39 ± 0.13 m/s, p = 0.035) and prone positions (1.40 ± 0.09 vs. 1.33 ± 0.10 m/s, p = 0.046) with higher values in supine SC segments (p = 0.019). Flow measurements revealed higher peak velocity and peak flow in SC than IR segments (all p < 0.001) with significant effects of examination position on peak velocity and cross-sectional area in SC (all p < 0.05). In prone position, peak velocity correlated negatively with aorta stiffness (SC: r = -0.75, p = 0.008; IR: r = -0.69, p = 0.019). This study demonstrated abdominal aortic MRE for directly depicting wall stiffness with minimal blood contribution. Segment-specific aortic wall stiffness was sensitive to circulatory loading and vascular distensibility. In a clinical context, high-resolution multifrequency MRE could serve as an imaging marker for vascular health and abdominal aortic risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NMR in Biomedicine
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70401
Primary Topic
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Abdominal Aortic Wall: Segmental, Positional and Flow Effects

Jing Guo, Tom Meyer, Thomas Elgeti, Ingolf Sack et al.
NMR in Biomedicine
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
article

Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Abdominal Aortic Wall: Segmental, Positional and Flow Effects

Jing Guo, Tom Meyer, Thomas Elgeti, Ingolf Sack, Jakob Schattenfroh, Yikun Wang, Yu Chien Wu, Xuan Wang, Jens Vogel‐Claussen, Yining Wang
article en

Abstract

Current aortic magnetic-resonance-elastography (MRE) infers wall stiffness indirectly from waveguide effects. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of abdominal aortic MRE for direct assessment of wall stiffness and its dependence on segmental region, patient position, and hemodynamic parameters. This prospective study examined 11 healthy young male volunteers using MRE to evaluate two anatomical segments of the abdominal aorta: the supraceliac (SC) and infrarenal (IR) segments. The volunteers underwent examinations in both the supine and prone positions. An ECG trigger delay was implemented for MRE to minimize the blood signal in the lumen. Three-dimensional wavefields were acquired at three mechanical frequencies (70, 80, and 90 Hz), and shear wave speed (SWS) maps were reconstructed as a stiffness surrogate. In addition, blood flow-velocity MRI was performed assess hemodynamic parameters. Test-retest examinations were performed in a subgroup to evaluate repeatability of aortic MRE. Aortic wall MRE was successful in all participants with good repeatability (ICC = 0.76). Mean wall SWS was higher in SC than IR segments at supine (1.47 ± 0.07 vs. 1.39 ± 0.13 m/s, p = 0.035) and prone positions (1.40 ± 0.09 vs. 1.33 ± 0.10 m/s, p = 0.046) with higher values in supine SC segments (p = 0.019). Flow measurements revealed higher peak velocity and peak flow in SC than IR segments (all p < 0.001) with significant effects of examination position on peak velocity and cross-sectional area in SC (all p < 0.05). In prone position, peak velocity correlated negatively with aorta stiffness (SC: r = -0.75, p = 0.008; IR: r = -0.69, p = 0.019). This study demonstrated abdominal aortic MRE for directly depicting wall stiffness with minimal blood contribution. Segment-specific aortic wall stiffness was sensitive to circulatory loading and vascular distensibility. In a clinical context, high-resolution multifrequency MRE could serve as an imaging marker for vascular health and abdominal aortic risk stratification.

NMR in BiomedicineVol. 39(10)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.