Modeling the effects of livestock rotation frequency on forage production and soil carbon using a spatially explicit grazing distribution

Livestock grazing strongly influences terrestrial ecosystems and carbon (C) dynamics, but outcomes depend on grazing management. High-frequency rotation (HFR) grazing may reduce the uneven grazing distribution commonly associated with low-frequency rotation (LFR), which can alter forage production and soil organic carbon (SOC). However, most ecosystem models do not explicitly represent uneven grazing distribution, limiting their ability to evaluate management effects. We enhanced the MEMS ecosystem model by incorporating discrete spatial units to simulate grazing distribution driven by key environmental drivers, including forage availability and quality, and distance to water. Using remote sensing-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI), we verified the simulated grazing distribution at an experimental rangeland site in Oklahoma. We tested the model’s sensitivity to rotation frequency under different management (stocking rate, timing, and duration) and weather (typical, dry, and wet) scenarios. Simulated light and moderate grazing generally sustained forage production and SOC regardless of rotation frequency. However, under heavy grazing, the 30-year projection showed HFR reduced localized overgrazing and sustained higher pasture average forage productivity and SOC stocks than LFR. Long-term experimental data are needed to validate these results. Our study offers guidance for designing grazing management experiments to address this critical knowledge gap and advance C management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Management
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2026.2732593
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Modeling the effects of livestock rotation frequency on forage production and soil carbon using a spatially explicit grazing distribution

Keith Paustian, Hugh Aljoe, Paige Stanley, Emma Hamilton et al.
Carbon Management
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Modeling the effects of livestock rotation frequency on forage production and soil carbon using a spatially explicit grazing distribution

Keith Paustian, Hugh Aljoe, Paige Stanley, Emma Hamilton, Isabella C.F. Maciel, Jeff J. Goodwin, Jason Rowntree, Stephen M. Ogle, Rafael S. Santos, M. Francesca Cotrufo, Hao Yang, Yao Zhang, Alejandro Romero-Ruiz, Guilhermo F. S. Congio, Erica L. Patterson
article en

Abstract

Livestock grazing strongly influences terrestrial ecosystems and carbon (C) dynamics, but outcomes depend on grazing management. High-frequency rotation (HFR) grazing may reduce the uneven grazing distribution commonly associated with low-frequency rotation (LFR), which can alter forage production and soil organic carbon (SOC). However, most ecosystem models do not explicitly represent uneven grazing distribution, limiting their ability to evaluate management effects. We enhanced the MEMS ecosystem model by incorporating discrete spatial units to simulate grazing distribution driven by key environmental drivers, including forage availability and quality, and distance to water. Using remote sensing-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI), we verified the simulated grazing distribution at an experimental rangeland site in Oklahoma. We tested the model’s sensitivity to rotation frequency under different management (stocking rate, timing, and duration) and weather (typical, dry, and wet) scenarios. Simulated light and moderate grazing generally sustained forage production and SOC regardless of rotation frequency. However, under heavy grazing, the 30-year projection showed HFR reduced localized overgrazing and sustained higher pasture average forage productivity and SOC stocks than LFR. Long-term experimental data are needed to validate these results. Our study offers guidance for designing grazing management experiments to address this critical knowledge gap and advance C management strategies.

Carbon ManagementVol. 17(1)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Noble (US), University of Neuchâtel (CH), Michigan State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Colorado State University, Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research, Noble Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.