Intrauterine Mepivacaine Instillation vs Placebo for Pain During IUD Placement

Importance: Concern about pain during intrauterine device (IUD) placement is common and reduces selection of an IUD. Reducing procedure-related pain may support informed contraceptive decision-making and patient autonomy and has also been associated with improved patient satisfaction and procedural experience. Objective: To determine whether intrauterine instillation of mepivacaine reduces pain during IUD placement in nulliparous individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 11 outpatient gynecology, maternal health, and youth clinics in Sweden from May 2021 through June 2024. Nulliparous individuals aged 18 to 31 years opting for IUDs with smaller-diameter placement tubes (levonorgestrel 19.5 mg, 13.5 mg, or copper IUD) were eligible. Key exclusion criteria included ongoing pregnancy, IUD replacement, pelvic infection, and allergy to local anesthetics. A total of 370 participants were randomized. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) (185 per group) to intrauterine instillation of 10 mL of mepivacaine (20 mg/mL) or sodium chloride (9 mg/mL) via a hydrosonography catheter 2 minutes before IUD placement. Participants, clinicians, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinician-adjusted difference in pain scores during IUD placement, measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The primary analysis included all randomized participants with available primary outcome data. Prespecified secondary analyses included tolerability and overall experience. Results: A total of 370 participants were randomized. Mean age was 21.7 (SD, 3.0) years in the mepivacaine group and 21.7 (SD, 2.9) years in the placebo group. Mean pain score during IUD placement was 43.8 mm (SD, 24.7) in the mepivacaine group and 58.6 mm (SD, 21.5) in the placebo group (mean difference, 14.8 mm [95% CI, 10.0-19.6]; P < .001). Adjustment for individual clinician yielded similar results (mean difference, 14.2 mm [95% CI, 9.7-18.6]; P < .001). Tolerable pain was reported by 172 of 175 participants (98.3%) in the mepivacaine group and 159 of 174 (91.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.13]; NNT, 15 [95% CI, 9-43]). Conclusions and Relevance: Intrauterine instillation of 10 mL of mepivacaine (20 mg/mL) significantly reduced pain and improved tolerability during IUD placement compared with instillation of placebo saline. Trial Registration: EudraCT Identifier: 2020-002271-36.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.14217
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Intrauterine Mepivacaine Instillation vs Placebo for Pain During IUD Placement

Helena Kopp Kallner, Karin Elgemark, Niklas Envall
JAMA
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Intrauterine Mepivacaine Instillation vs Placebo for Pain During IUD Placement

Helena Kopp Kallner, Karin Elgemark, Niklas Envall
article en

Abstract

Importance: Concern about pain during intrauterine device (IUD) placement is common and reduces selection of an IUD. Reducing procedure-related pain may support informed contraceptive decision-making and patient autonomy and has also been associated with improved patient satisfaction and procedural experience. Objective: To determine whether intrauterine instillation of mepivacaine reduces pain during IUD placement in nulliparous individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 11 outpatient gynecology, maternal health, and youth clinics in Sweden from May 2021 through June 2024. Nulliparous individuals aged 18 to 31 years opting for IUDs with smaller-diameter placement tubes (levonorgestrel 19.5 mg, 13.5 mg, or copper IUD) were eligible. Key exclusion criteria included ongoing pregnancy, IUD replacement, pelvic infection, and allergy to local anesthetics. A total of 370 participants were randomized. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) (185 per group) to intrauterine instillation of 10 mL of mepivacaine (20 mg/mL) or sodium chloride (9 mg/mL) via a hydrosonography catheter 2 minutes before IUD placement. Participants, clinicians, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was clinician-adjusted difference in pain scores during IUD placement, measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The primary analysis included all randomized participants with available primary outcome data. Prespecified secondary analyses included tolerability and overall experience. Results: A total of 370 participants were randomized. Mean age was 21.7 (SD, 3.0) years in the mepivacaine group and 21.7 (SD, 2.9) years in the placebo group. Mean pain score during IUD placement was 43.8 mm (SD, 24.7) in the mepivacaine group and 58.6 mm (SD, 21.5) in the placebo group (mean difference, 14.8 mm [95% CI, 10.0-19.6]; P < .001). Adjustment for individual clinician yielded similar results (mean difference, 14.2 mm [95% CI, 9.7-18.6]; P < .001). Tolerable pain was reported by 172 of 175 participants (98.3%) in the mepivacaine group and 159 of 174 (91.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.13]; NNT, 15 [95% CI, 9-43]). Conclusions and Relevance: Intrauterine instillation of 10 mL of mepivacaine (20 mg/mL) significantly reduced pain and improved tolerability during IUD placement compared with instillation of placebo saline. Trial Registration: EudraCT Identifier: 2020-002271-36.

JAMA
Dalarna University (SE), Danderyds sjukhus (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Södertälje Sjukhus (SE), Norrköping Hospital (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.