Care delivery among patients with early-onset versus average-onset cholangiocarcinoma: a nationwide retrospective analysis

Background Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive biliary malignancy with increasing incidence and poor prognosis. Although traditionally considered a disease of older adults, early-onset CCA (EOCCA; age <50 years) may represent a clinically distinct subgroup. Data evaluating diagnostic and treatment trajectories in EOCCA remain limited. Patients and methods Using the Komodo Healthcare Map claims database (2017-2024), patients with CCA were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes and categorized as having EOCCA or average-onset CCA. Outcomes included time from first diagnosed symptom to CCA diagnosis, diagnostic delay (≥30 days), time to first intervention, and type of first intervention. Multivariable logistic, log-gamma, and competing-risk regression models evaluated associations between demographic and insurance factors and care delivery outcomes. Results Among 116 106 patients with CCA, 5146 (4.4%) had EOCCA. Of 43 137 patients with symptoms documented in their claims data, EOCCA was independently associated with longer time to diagnosis [expβ 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.20, P < 0.001] and higher odds of diagnostic delay of ≥30 days [odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.36, P < 0.001]. Overall time to first intervention did not differ significantly between cohorts; however, patients with EOCCA were more likely to receive cancer-directed therapy (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25). Within the EOCCA cohort, longer diagnostic intervals reduced the likelihood of intervention, and disparities in treatment receipt were observed among racial minorities and publicly insured patients. Conclusions The EOCCA cohort represents a clinically vulnerable population characterized by significant diagnostic delays and sociodemographic disparities in care delivery. Earlier recognition and system-level interventions to improve access and streamline diagnostic pathways are needed to optimize outcomes in younger patients with CCA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100405
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Care delivery among patients with early-onset versus average-onset cholangiocarcinoma: a nationwide retrospective analysis

Seth J. Concors, Timothy J. Brown, Amanda C. Nottke, Juan W. Valle et al.
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Care delivery among patients with early-onset versus average-onset cholangiocarcinoma: a nationwide retrospective analysis

Seth J. Concors, Timothy J. Brown, Amanda C. Nottke, Juan W. Valle, Ángela Lamarca, Nicholas J. Hornstein, U.S. Grewal, B.T. Loeffler
article en

Abstract

Background Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive biliary malignancy with increasing incidence and poor prognosis. Although traditionally considered a disease of older adults, early-onset CCA (EOCCA; age <50 years) may represent a clinically distinct subgroup. Data evaluating diagnostic and treatment trajectories in EOCCA remain limited. Patients and methods Using the Komodo Healthcare Map claims database (2017-2024), patients with CCA were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes and categorized as having EOCCA or average-onset CCA. Outcomes included time from first diagnosed symptom to CCA diagnosis, diagnostic delay (≥30 days), time to first intervention, and type of first intervention. Multivariable logistic, log-gamma, and competing-risk regression models evaluated associations between demographic and insurance factors and care delivery outcomes. Results Among 116 106 patients with CCA, 5146 (4.4%) had EOCCA. Of 43 137 patients with symptoms documented in their claims data, EOCCA was independently associated with longer time to diagnosis [expβ 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.20, P < 0.001] and higher odds of diagnostic delay of ≥30 days [odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.36, P < 0.001]. Overall time to first intervention did not differ significantly between cohorts; however, patients with EOCCA were more likely to receive cancer-directed therapy (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25). Within the EOCCA cohort, longer diagnostic intervals reduced the likelihood of intervention, and disparities in treatment receipt were observed among racial minorities and publicly insured patients. Conclusions The EOCCA cohort represents a clinically vulnerable population characterized by significant diagnostic delays and sociodemographic disparities in care delivery. Earlier recognition and system-level interventions to improve access and streamline diagnostic pathways are needed to optimize outcomes in younger patients with CCA.

ESMO Gastrointestinal OncologyVol. 14
Northwell Health (US), Emory University (US), University of Manchester (GB), Piedmont Cancer Institute (US), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation (US), University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.