The “readily available” second-line antibiotics are more cost-effective than the “easily accessible” first-line antibiotics as the initial management of Urinary Tract Infections and Chorioamnionitis in Malawi

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has health and economic implications for patients, healthcare providers, and the society. In Malawi, infections, including AMR, account for 22% of the maternal mortality. Economic evaluation of AMR is required to understand the cost-benefits of bacterial infection treatment strategies and antibiotic prescriptions for maternal infections and AMR. Notably, evidence of the comparative cost-effectiveness of commonly used antibiotics for maternal infection treatment is scarce. Methods Using a decision tree model, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of second-line antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone) against first-line antibiotics (amoxicillin, gentamicin, and ampicillin) for the management of maternal infections in Malawi. The analysis considered both outpatient (urinary tract infection) and inpatient (chorioamnionitis) scenarios. Results The results indicate that the “readily available” second-line antibiotics have a cost advantage, with incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratios (ICERs) below Malawi’s GDP per capita (634.8 USD/capita). A total of 0.157cents per infection were resolved for urinary tract infection and 0.673 cents per infection were resolved for chorioamnionitis. Conclusion This study provides short-term, static insights into the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic treatment strategies for maternal bacterial infections like UTI and chorioamnionitis in Malawi and similar low-resource settings. Healthcare providers should weigh cost advantage against clinical consequence when: 1) prescribing readily available, easily accessible Access-group antibiotics as first-line treatment, and 2) transitioning patients with confirmed non-response to less accessible, second-line Watch-group agents. Because wider second-line use drives resistance, switching should be guided by susceptibility testing, not adopted by default.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.24007.2
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The “readily available” second-line antibiotics are more cost-effective than the “easily accessible” first-line antibiotics as the initial management of Urinary Tract Infections and Chorioamnionitis in Malawi

Andrew Weeks, Effita Masoamphambe, James Jafali, Leonard Mndala et al.
Wellcome Open Research
Urinary Tract Infections Management
article

The “readily available” second-line antibiotics are more cost-effective than the “easily accessible” first-line antibiotics as the initial management of Urinary Tract Infections and Chorioamnionitis in Malawi

Andrew Weeks, Effita Masoamphambe, James Jafali, Leonard Mndala, Chikondi Chapuma, Evans Otieku, Wala Kamchedzera, David Kulapani
article en

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has health and economic implications for patients, healthcare providers, and the society. In Malawi, infections, including AMR, account for 22% of the maternal mortality. Economic evaluation of AMR is required to understand the cost-benefits of bacterial infection treatment strategies and antibiotic prescriptions for maternal infections and AMR. Notably, evidence of the comparative cost-effectiveness of commonly used antibiotics for maternal infection treatment is scarce. Methods Using a decision tree model, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of second-line antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone) against first-line antibiotics (amoxicillin, gentamicin, and ampicillin) for the management of maternal infections in Malawi. The analysis considered both outpatient (urinary tract infection) and inpatient (chorioamnionitis) scenarios. Results The results indicate that the “readily available” second-line antibiotics have a cost advantage, with incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratios (ICERs) below Malawi’s GDP per capita (634.8 USD/capita). A total of 0.157cents per infection were resolved for urinary tract infection and 0.673 cents per infection were resolved for chorioamnionitis. Conclusion This study provides short-term, static insights into the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic treatment strategies for maternal bacterial infections like UTI and chorioamnionitis in Malawi and similar low-resource settings. Healthcare providers should weigh cost advantage against clinical consequence when: 1) prescribing readily available, easily accessible Access-group antibiotics as first-line treatment, and 2) transitioning patients with confirmed non-response to less accessible, second-line Watch-group agents. Because wider second-line use drives resistance, switching should be guided by susceptibility testing, not adopted by default.

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 10
University of Ghana (GH), University of Liverpool (GB), Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme (MW), Kamuzu Central Hospital (MW), Liverpool Women's Hospital (GB), Central Denmark Region (DK)
Wellcome Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.