Evaluation of MET Detection Methods and Cutoffs in EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Disease Progression on Osimertinib in the phase II SAVANNAH study

Purpose In the phase II SAVANNAH study (NCT03778229), savolitinib 300 mg BID plus osimertinib demonstrated a high objective response rate (ORR; 56%) in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer and high levels of MET overexpression and/or amplification following first-line osimertinib (primary efficacy population). We report earlier analyses from SAVANNAH leading to selection of the MET cutoffs used to define the primary efficacy population. Experimental Design MET overexpression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MET amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MET cutoffs were initially defined as 3+ staining in ≥50% of tumor cells (IHC3+/≥50%) and MET gene copy number ≥5 or MET:CEP7 ratio ≥2 (FISH5+), respectively. Results Confirmed ORR generally increased with increasing MET levels. MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+ were identified as the optimal cutoffs. ORR: 49% (MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+ subgroup) versus 9% (without MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+); 32% (MET IHC3+/≥50% and/or FISH5+). Estimated prevalence was 62% for MET IHC3+/≥50% and/or FISH5+ status and 34% for MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+ status. Conclusions Biomarker analyses from the SAVANNAH study found that MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+ were the most appropriate cutoffs for savolitinib plus osimertinib treatment of EGFR-mutated, MET‑overexpressed and/or amplified, advanced NSCLC following progression on osimertinib. These MET cutoffs will be used to determine eligibility in the ongoing phase III SAFFRON study. Our work highlights the importance of appropriate biomarker selection in EGFR-mutated, MET‑overexpressed and/or amplified, advanced NSCLC and supports MET biomarker cutoffs as a useful approach to identify patients most likely to respond to therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-0604
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluation of MET Detection Methods and Cutoffs in EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Disease Progression on Osimertinib in the phase II SAVANNAH study

Silvia Novello, Filippo de Marinis, Susanna Y. Cheng, Claudia Proto et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Evaluation of MET Detection Methods and Cutoffs in EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Disease Progression on Osimertinib in the phase II SAVANNAH study

Silvia Novello, Filippo de Marinis, Susanna Y. Cheng, Claudia Proto, Myung‐Ju Ahn, Giulio Metro, Sang‐We Kim, Ryan J. Hartmaier, James Chih‐Hsin Yang, Laura Bonanno, Byoung Chul Cho, Gina D’Angelo, Lecia V. Sequist, Wanning Xu, Tae Min Kim, Jong Seok Lee, Alexander Todd, Aino Telaranta-Keerie
article en

Abstract

Purpose In the phase II SAVANNAH study (NCT03778229), savolitinib 300 mg BID plus osimertinib demonstrated a high objective response rate (ORR; 56%) in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer and high levels of MET overexpression and/or amplification following first-line osimertinib (primary efficacy population). We report earlier analyses from SAVANNAH leading to selection of the MET cutoffs used to define the primary efficacy population. Experimental Design MET overexpression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MET amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MET cutoffs were initially defined as 3+ staining in ≥50% of tumor cells (IHC3+/≥50%) and MET gene copy number ≥5 or MET:CEP7 ratio ≥2 (FISH5+), respectively. Results Confirmed ORR generally increased with increasing MET levels. MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+ were identified as the optimal cutoffs. ORR: 49% (MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+ subgroup) versus 9% (without MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+); 32% (MET IHC3+/≥50% and/or FISH5+). Estimated prevalence was 62% for MET IHC3+/≥50% and/or FISH5+ status and 34% for MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+ status. Conclusions Biomarker analyses from the SAVANNAH study found that MET IHC3+/≥90% and/or FISH10+ were the most appropriate cutoffs for savolitinib plus osimertinib treatment of EGFR-mutated, MET‑overexpressed and/or amplified, advanced NSCLC following progression on osimertinib. These MET cutoffs will be used to determine eligibility in the ongoing phase III SAFFRON study. Our work highlights the importance of appropriate biomarker selection in EGFR-mutated, MET‑overexpressed and/or amplified, advanced NSCLC and supports MET biomarker cutoffs as a useful approach to identify patients most likely to respond to therapy.

Clinical Cancer Research
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), Ulsan College (KR), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Padua (IT), Yonsei University (KR), University of Perugia (IT), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), AstraZeneca (Netherlands) (NL), AstraZeneca (Singapore) (SG), AstraZeneca (Brazil) (BR), AstraZeneca (Switzerland) (CH), AstraZeneca (Japan) (JP), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), AstraZeneca (Poland) (PL), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Turin (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.