Towards appropriate guidance for the ethical challenges of environmentally sustainable prescribing

The environmental impact of medicines poses a significant threat to planetary and public health, making it essential to integrate environmental sustainability into prescribing practices. While the most effective measures to reduce environmental impact, such as reducing unnecessary prescriptions and medication waste, are consistent with appropriate prescribing and relatively straightforward, incorporating environmental considerations into choices between alternative medicines can raise complex ethical questions. This article examines these challenges in light of the established biomedical ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice and respect for autonomy, while considering values at both individual and societal levels and integrating perspectives from current literature in this field. It discusses how environmental sustainability, along with its associated population benefits, can be aligned with direct patient benefits and considers the implications for distributive and intergenerational justice, as well as for shared decision-making and patient autonomy. It also explores the allocation of responsibilities among stakeholders and argues that environmentally sustainable prescribing should not be the sole responsibility of individuals. Ethical guidance should facilitate proportional, context-sensitive, environmentally sustainable decision-making, acknowledging that appropriate decisions also depend on factors such as disease severity and exact variations in treatment efficacy and safety. To this end, the article proposes three key steps: developing case-based ethical analyses of prescribing dilemmas, translating these analyses into stakeholder-informed value frameworks and embedding these frameworks in practical guidelines and decision aids. Together, these measures can support a responsible integration of environmental sustainability into prescribing practices, safeguarding high-quality patient care while promoting the health of all current and future populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70831
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Towards appropriate guidance for the ethical challenges of environmentally sustainable prescribing

Carlotta Lunghi, Steven R. Kraaijeveld, Amy Booth, Patricia M. L. A. van den Bemt et al.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Towards appropriate guidance for the ethical challenges of environmentally sustainable prescribing

Carlotta Lunghi, Steven R. Kraaijeveld, Amy Booth, Patricia M. L. A. van den Bemt, Lorena Dima, Erik M. Donker, Michiel A. van Agtmael, Marc Labriffe, Charlotte L. Bekker, Mathilde Jalving, Thijs H. Oude Munnink, Caroline Moermond, Elisabetta Poluzzi, Robert Likić, SanYuMay Tun, Milan C. Richir, Joost D. Piët, Jelle Tichelaar, Yolande Voskes, João Costa, Fabrizio De Ponti, Ben J. A. Janssen, Tomás Mauro van Emden
article en

Abstract

The environmental impact of medicines poses a significant threat to planetary and public health, making it essential to integrate environmental sustainability into prescribing practices. While the most effective measures to reduce environmental impact, such as reducing unnecessary prescriptions and medication waste, are consistent with appropriate prescribing and relatively straightforward, incorporating environmental considerations into choices between alternative medicines can raise complex ethical questions. This article examines these challenges in light of the established biomedical ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice and respect for autonomy, while considering values at both individual and societal levels and integrating perspectives from current literature in this field. It discusses how environmental sustainability, along with its associated population benefits, can be aligned with direct patient benefits and considers the implications for distributive and intergenerational justice, as well as for shared decision-making and patient autonomy. It also explores the allocation of responsibilities among stakeholders and argues that environmentally sustainable prescribing should not be the sole responsibility of individuals. Ethical guidance should facilitate proportional, context-sensitive, environmentally sustainable decision-making, acknowledging that appropriate decisions also depend on factors such as disease severity and exact variations in treatment efficacy and safety. To this end, the article proposes three key steps: developing case-based ethical analyses of prescribing dilemmas, translating these analyses into stakeholder-informed value frameworks and embedding these frameworks in practical guidelines and decision aids. Together, these measures can support a responsible integration of environmental sustainability into prescribing practices, safeguarding high-quality patient care while promoting the health of all current and future populations.

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR), University of Lisbon (PT), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Inserm (FR), University of Zagreb (HR), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University of Surrey (GB), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Transylvania University of Brașov (RO), Maastricht University (NL), Cal Humanities (US), Subsea 7 (France) (FR), The Quebec Population Health Research Network (CA), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges (FR), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Health & Safety in Sports (NL), Link Campus University (IT), Université Laval (CA), Université de Limoges (FR), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Inholland University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.